[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1

2024-03-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 --- Comment #4 from Gianfranco --- binutils 2.42-4ubuntu1 looks working now. Closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1

2024-03-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2024-03-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2024-03-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #23 from Gianfranco --- With binutils 2.42-4ubuntu1 looks like it is fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2024-03-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #22 from Gianfranco --- With binutils 2.42-4ubuntu1 looks like it is fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1

2023-08-29 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco --- Hello @Nick, ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2023-07-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #21 from Gianfranco --- Ok I opened https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 to track this new issue, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30685] bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1

2023-07-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30685 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco --- The tarball of the whole armhf chroot can be found here: https://drive.abinsula.com/index.php/s/uCTPVGovwIjXSor (note the link might expire in a few days) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug ld/30685] New: bfd fails with lto on armhf and clang-16 (symbol from plugin): Number of symbols in input file has increased from 0 to 1

2023-07-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Version: 2.41 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- As said in 27659 gold works: # /usr/bin

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2023-07-23 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #19 from Gianfranco --- Hello, now with neweer llvm and binutils, it fails with a more clear error (gold still good) /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld.bfd -EL -X --hash-style=gnu --build-id --eh-frame-hdr -m armelf_linux_eabi -dynam

[Bug gold/30536] ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-21 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536 --- Comment #12 from Gianfranco --- Hello, testing was successful, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/30536] ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-21 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536 --- Comment #11 from Gianfranco --- thanks! I'll test shortly! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/30536] ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-20 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536 --- Comment #6 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 14939 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14939&action=edit crt*.o files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/30536] ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-15 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536 --- Comment #4 from Gianfranco --- Hello Alan, thanks for the answer. I uploaded here [1] the .so files in a single directory [1] https://drive.abinsula.com/index.php/s/NMDO384gjCOCEJw With this command I could reproduce again the issue, let

[Bug gold/30536] ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-13 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.40|2.41 (HEAD) --- Comment #2 from Gianfran

[Bug gold/30536] ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-10 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco --- https://drive.abinsula.com/index.php/s/UAPjvTzcXNc3Bhi Here you can find the .a libraries and the clang binaries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/30536] ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-10 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30536 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com -- You are rece

[Bug gold/30536] New: ppc64el gold linker produces unusable clang-16 binary

2023-06-10 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- root@Unimatrix08-Jammy:/clang# /usr/bin/g++-12 -O3 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wno

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-07-05 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #15 from Gianfranco --- Hello, I meant to apply that patch already in mainline (applied to elf_swap_symbol_in), also to elf_swap_symbol_out function! Anyway, I applied your patch and rebuilt binutils in Ubuntu (latest snapshot of

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-07-05 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #13 from Gianfranco --- sure, maybe something like this: commit 8384fb8f0c3c451f7aa8164fc87e162eb9816925 Author: Alan Modra <@*.com> Date: Fri Sep 22 13:16:45 2006 + * elfcode.h (elf_swap_symbol_in): Retu

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-07-05 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #11 from Gianfranco --- #0 elf32_arm_swap_symbol_out (abfd=0x528c58, src=0x5285ec, cdst=0x5489a8, shndx=0x0) at ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:19701 newsym = {st_value = 5408208, st_size = 1, st_name = 0, st_info = 152 '\230', st_o

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-07-05 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #10 from Gianfranco --- does this help? #0 elf32_arm_swap_symbol_out (abfd=0x528c58, src=0x5285d0, cdst=0x548998, shndx=0x0) at ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:19701 newsym = {st_value = 0, st_size = 5540248, st_name = 0, st_info =

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-06-29 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #8 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 13516 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13516&action=edit log file Hello, looks like your patch was already into master branch, and then in Ubuntu development release

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-05-31 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #3 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 13475 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13475&action=edit LLVMgold.so library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-05-31 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #4 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 13476 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13476&action=edit libgcc_s.so.1 library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-05-31 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #5 from Gianfranco --- Hello Nick, I attached the two missing libraries, I hope they can help moving the issue a little bit further -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27659] BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-03-28 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27659 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco --- Created attachment 13334 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13334&action=edit object files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27659] New: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elfcode.h:224 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out

2021-03-28 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Version: 2.36.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1 --> ht

[Bug binutils/25031] nm reports wrong address on 32bit

2019-09-25 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031 --- Comment #5 from Gianfranco --- thanks a ton for the quick fixes! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org h

[Bug binutils/25031] nm reports wrong address on 32bit

2019-09-24 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25031 --- Comment #1 from Gianfranco --- Please see this Debian discussion for more information https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/issues/69 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/25031] New: nm reports wrong address on 32bit

2019-09-24 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 12001 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12001&action=edit example This happens since binutils 2.32.51.2

[Bug binutils/25018] New: readelf crash on 32bits (at least i386 and armhf)

2019-09-19 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 11996 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11996&action=edit example of failing file I

[Bug gold/21868] [2.29/2.30 Regression] ICE in fix_errata_and_relocate_erratum_stubs, at ../../gold/aarch64.cc:1999

2017-08-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21868 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.

[Bug ld/21334] [MIPS] Undefined hidden symbols cause assertion failure bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3860

2017-04-27 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #15 from Gianfranco --- makes sense, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists

[Bug ld/21334] [MIPS] Undefined hidden symbols cause assertion failure bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3860

2017-04-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 --- Comment #13 from Gianfranco --- Hello, can we have the testcase added to the testsuite to avoid regressions? thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug ld/21334] [MIPS] Undefined hidden symbols cause assertion failure bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3860

2017-03-31 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-26 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 --- Comment #13 from Gianfranco --- Alastair, was the issue you got introduced by the same commit? You might want to understand when the regression started, and open a new issue in case. Fixing two different bugs in a single bug number is som

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-22 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 --- Comment #11 from Gianfranco --- thanks you all! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-22 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 --- Comment #10 from Gianfranco --- The fix is confirmed, after two days ghc finally is finishing the build! (the part where the link was failing is succeeding now, and the build is ending in a few hours). So, confirming that now it works. -

[Bug binutils/21233] Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-08 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21233 Gianfranco changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mips*-*-* -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug binutils/21233] New: Internal error, /usr/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.28 assertion fail ../../bfd/elfxx-mips.c:3861

2017-03-08 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
: 2.28 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- Hello, I suspect the changes below introduced a

[Bug ld/19795] LD crash on mipsel aborting at ../../bfd/merge.c:909 in _bfd_merged_section_offset

2016-03-20 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19795 --- Comment #2 from Gianfranco --- Hi Nick, unfortunately I don't know how to create a small testcase. The failure seems to happen when a lot of .a static libraries are tried to be linked together. I extracted them with some scripting, and p

[Bug ld/19795] New: LD crash on mipsel aborting at ../../bfd/merge.c:909 in _bfd_merged_section_offset

2016-03-09 Thread costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: costamagnagianfranco at yahoo dot it Target Milestone: --- As said, the latest llvm-toolchain-3.8 in debian/mipsel is segfaulting because of a linker error. llvm