https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #28 from Luca Boccassi ---
As user and owner of the spec, I am fine with any of those options. A slight
preference for a new command line (option A), as that means you don't need to
worry about version matching - if the new flag is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #26 from Luca Boccassi ---
(In reply to Benjamin Drung from comment #25)
> (In reply to Luca Boccassi from comment #24)
> > (In reply to Benjamin Drung from comment #23)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > > > (In repl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #24 from Luca Boccassi ---
(In reply to Benjamin Drung from comment #23)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > (In reply to Benjamin Drung from comment #13)
> >
> > > > Will "%[string]" escape work?
> > >
> > > Like this?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #21 from Luca Boccassi ---
(In reply to Luca Boccassi from comment #10)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> > For non-working --package-metadata, we should either remove it or fix it.
>
> Sorry, but this is absolutely wrong,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
--- Comment #10 from Luca Boccassi ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> For non-working --package-metadata, we should either remove it or fix it.
Sorry, but this is absolutely wrong, as the existing option works just fine. I
do not min
