[Bug binutils/16952] New: PowerPC LD requests bug report. Issue related to EABI symbols _SDA_BASE_, _SDA2_BASE_

2014-05-16 Thread bcbrock at us dot ibm.com
Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: bcbrock at us dot ibm.com We plan to link an embedded application using the .PPC.EMB.sdata0 facility of the PowerPC EABI. A simple test failed, and LD

[Bug ld/16924] PowerPC Relocation R_PPC_ADDR16 is using the wrong overflow checker

2014-05-09 Thread bcbrock at us dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16924 --- Comment #3 from Bishop Brock --- > (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) Well, I tried to delete my comments/questions about the patch, but was unsuccessful :-) Anyway, I had thought to ask, given that you allow ORI to treat its opera

[Bug ld/16924] PowerPC Relocation R_PPC_ADDR16 is using the wrong overflow checker

2014-05-09 Thread bcbrock at us dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16924 --- Comment #2 from Bishop Brock --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) Hi Alan, We had trouble building the head version a couple of months ago so we based our assembler on the 2.24 release. I see the fix and we'll incorporate it. Reg

[Bug ld/16924] New: PowerPC Relocation R_PPC_ADDR16 is using the wrong overflow checker

2014-05-08 Thread bcbrock at us dot ibm.com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: bcbrock at us dot ibm.com We believe there is a mistake in the definition of the R_PPC_ADDR16 relocation, found in bfd/elf32-ppc.c /* A standard 16 bit relocation. */ HOWTO