[Bug ld/25151] writing section `.text' at huge (ie negative) file offset

2019-11-04 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25151 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kobets --- Ok. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25151] writing section `.text' at huge (ie negative) file offset

2019-11-03 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25151 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kobets --- The -Ttext-segment resolve a problem. Do you know, how to compile with an option, that turns .note.gnu.property section off? I know, how to use strip, but it clears object so deep, and currently I simpl

[Bug ld/25151] writing section `.text' at huge (ie negative) file offset

2019-11-01 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25151 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kobets --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > Please attach your compiled object file, so that we don't need to guess your > compiler version and many other details. I could not reproduce this bug. I am

[Bug ld/25151] writing section `.text' at huge (ie negative) file offset

2019-11-01 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25151 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kobets --- Created attachment 12059 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12059&action=edit Object file maked in Ubuntu Linux 19.10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC lis

[Bug ld/25151] writing section `.text' at huge (ie negative) file offset

2019-11-01 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25151 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kobets --- Created attachment 12058 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12058&action=edit Object file maked in Ubuntu Linux 19.04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC lis

[Bug ld/13616] linker should pad executable sections with nops, not zeros

2019-10-30 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13616 Alexander Kobets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akobets at mail dot ru

[Bug ld/25151] writing section `.text' at huge (ie negative) file offset

2019-10-30 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25151 Alexander Kobets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akobets at mail dot ru

[Bug ld/25151] New: writing section `.text' at huge (ie negative) file offset

2019-10-30 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
ormal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: akobets at mail dot ru Target Milestone: --- Ubuntu Linux 19.10, Kernel 5.3.0 prog.c == int start() { return 1; } == gcc -c -mcmodel=kernel -fno-PIC -O2 prog

[Bug gas/15832] New: Add support of source files in Unicode

2013-08-13 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: akobets at mail dot ru Currently assembler can compile files in ASCII only. I want files in Unicode UTF-8 or UCS-2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug gas/15832] Add support of source files in Unicode

2013-08-13 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15832 Alexander Kobets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akobets at mail dot ru -- You are

[Bug gas/15034] MOVABS fails in intel syntax, good in att. Behavior mismatch intel vs att syntax

2013-01-21 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15034 Alexander Kobets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akobets at mail dot ru --- Comment

[Bug gas/15034] MOVABS fails in intel syntax, good in att. Behavior mismatch intel vs att syntax

2013-01-18 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15034 Alexander Kobets changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu URL

[Bug gas/15034] New: MOVABS fails in intel syntax, good in att. Behavior mismatch intel vs att syntax

2013-01-18 Thread akobets at mail dot ru
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15034 Bug #: 15034 Summary: MOVABS fails in intel syntax, good in att. Behavior mismatch intel vs att syntax Product: binutils Version: 2.23 Status: NEW Severity: