[Bug binutils/24435] heap overflow in bfd_getl64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24435 --- Comment #7 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Well, the testcase to reproduce on master is different from the testcase to reproduce on 2.32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/24435] heap overflow in bfd_getl64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24435 --- Comment #5 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 11738 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11738&action=edit testcase2 Can you try this testcase instead? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug binutils/24435] heap overflow in bfd_getl64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24435 --- Comment #3 from Agostino Sarubbo --- I can reproduce the issue with the master compiled today, so I really guess that the fix was not complete: gf (CHROOT) crashes $ ld -v GNU ld (Gentoo ) 2.32.51.20190410 gf (CHROOT) crashes $ ld 1.c

[Bug binutils/24436] assertion failure in elf64-x86-64.c:2374

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24436 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 11734 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11734&action=edit stacktrace -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/24436] New: assertion failure in elf64-x86-64.c:2374

: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 11733 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11733&action=edit testcase On 2.32 (but reproducible on master): ld $FILE /usr

[Bug binutils/24435] heap overflow in bfd_getl64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24435 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 11732 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11732&action=edit stacktrace -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/24435] New: heap overflow in bfd_getl64

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 11731 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11731&action=edit testcase On 2.32 (but reproducible on master): ld $FILE ==10118

[Bug binutils/22261] invalid memory read in gold::need_decompressed_section(char const*) (object.cc)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22261 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10518 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10518&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22261] New: invalid memory read in gold::need_decompressed_section(char const*) (object.cc)

) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10517 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi

[Bug binutils/22259] out of bounds read in elfcpp::Elf_file<64, false, gold::Object>::section_name[abi:cxx11](unsigned int) const (elfcpp_file.h)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22259 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10516 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10516&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22259] New: out of bounds read in elfcpp::Elf_file<64, false, gold::Object>::section_name[abi:cxx11](unsigned int) const (elfcpp_file.h)

nutils Version: 2.30 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10515 --&

[Bug binutils/22258] NULL pointer dereference in gold::is_prefix_of (gold.h)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22258 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10514 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10514&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22258] New: NULL pointer dereference in gold::is_prefix_of (gold.h)

Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10513 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10513&action=edit stacktr

[Bug binutils/22257] NULL pointer dereference in gold::Dwo_file::add_strings (dwp.cc)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22257 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10512 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10512&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22257] New: NULL pointer dereference in gold::Dwo_file::add_strings (dwp.cc)

: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10511 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10511&action=edit stacktrace

[Bug binutils/22256] invalid memory read in gold::Dwo_file::add_strings (dwp.cc)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22256 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10510 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10510&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22256] New: invalid memory read in gold::Dwo_file::add_strings (dwp.cc)

: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10509 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10509&action=edit stacktr

[Bug binutils/22255] NULL pointer dereference in elfcpp::Shdr<64, false>::get_sh_type() const (elfcpp.h)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22255 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10508 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10508&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22255] New: NULL pointer dereference in elfcpp::Shdr<64, false>::get_sh_type() const (elfcpp.h)

FIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10507 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10507&am

[Bug binutils/22240] hang of the objdump process

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22240 --- Comment #7 from Agostino Sarubbo --- it takes 2 hours here. If you think that it is fine, feel free to close. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug

[Bug binutils/22240] hang of the objdump process

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22240 --- Comment #5 from Agostino Sarubbo --- does the process ends for you? after how much time? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing lis

[Bug binutils/22246] memory allocation failure

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22246 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10505 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10505&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22246] New: memory allocation failure

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10504 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10504&action=edit screenshot of the issue On 2.29.51.20171004 the size process consumes 2

[Bug binutils/22240] hang of the objdump process

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22240 --- Comment #3 from Agostino Sarubbo --- I get into this loop: /usr/bin/objdump: res_debug.o: not a dynamic object SYMBOL TABLE: no symbols DYNAMIC SYMBOL TABLE: no symbols Can't get contents for section ''. Can't get contents for secti

[Bug binutils/22240] hang of the objdump process

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22240 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- also the process uses the 100% of the cpu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binu

[Bug binutils/22240] New: hang of the objdump process

: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10500 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10500&action=edit testcase On 2.29.51.20171002, the attached testcase freezes the

[Bug admin/22239] invalid memory read in display_debug_frames (dwarf.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22239 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10499 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10499&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug admin/22239] New: invalid memory read in display_debug_frames (dwarf.c)

Component: admin Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10498 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10498&action=edit stacktrace On 2.29.51.20171002: # objdump -g -

[Bug binutils/22232] NULL pointer dereference in load_specific_debug_section (objdump.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22232 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10496 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10496&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22232] New: NULL pointer dereference in load_specific_debug_section (objdump.c)

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10495 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10495&action=edit stacktr

[Bug binutils/22230] heap-based buffer overflow in display_debug_macro (dwarf.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22230 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10494 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10494&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22230] New: heap-based buffer overflow in display_debug_macro (dwarf.c)

: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10493 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10493&action=edit stacktrace.

[Bug binutils/22209] invalid memory read in _bfd_safe_read_leb128 (libbfd.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22209 --- Comment #2 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10483 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10483&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22209] invalid memory read in _bfd_safe_read_leb128 (libbfd.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22209 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10482 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10482&action=edit stacktrace -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/22209] New: invalid memory read in _bfd_safe_read_leb128 (libbfd.c)

Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- On master at 1da5c9a485f3dcac4c45e96ef4b7dae5948314b5: # nm -V GNU nm (Gentoo git) 2.29.51.20170925 Command to reproduce: # nm

[Bug binutils/22205] NULL pointer dereference in concat_filename (dwarf2.c) (UNFIXED PR22200)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22205 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10479 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10479&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22205] New: NULL pointer dereference in concat_filename (dwarf2.c) (UNFIXED PR22200)

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10478 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10478&action=edit sta

[Bug binutils/22202] heap-based buffer overflow in parse_die (dwarf1.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22202 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10474 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10474&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22202] New: heap-based buffer overflow in parse_die (dwarf1.c)

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10473 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10473&action=edit stacktrace On ma

[Bug binutils/22201] NULL pointer dereference in bfd_hash_hash (hash.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22201 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10472 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10472&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22201] New: NULL pointer dereference in bfd_hash_hash (hash.c)

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10471 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10471&action=edit stacktrace On ma

[Bug binutils/22200] NULL pointer dereference in concat_filename (dwarf2.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22200 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10470 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10470&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22200] New: NULL pointer dereference in concat_filename (dwarf2.c)

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10469 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10469&action=edit stacktrace On ma

[Bug binutils/22197] heap-based buffer overflow in bfd_getl32 (libbfd.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22197 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10467 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10467&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22197] New: heap-based buffer overflow in bfd_getl32 (libbfd.c)

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10466 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10466&action=edit stacktrace On ma

[Bug binutils/22187] infinite loop in find_abstract_instance_name (dwarf2.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22187 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10462 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10462&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22187] New: infinite loop in find_abstract_instance_name (dwarf2.c)

Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10461 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10461&action=edit stacktrace On master c

[Bug binutils/22186] divide-by-zero in decode_line_info (dwarf2.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22186 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10460 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10460&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22186] New: divide-by-zero in decode_line_info (dwarf2.c)

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10459 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10459&action=edit stacktrace On master compiled on 20170921 # nm -V

[Bug binutils/22176] memory allocation failure in print_symbol (nm.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22176 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10455 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10455&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22175] memory allocation failure in _objalloc_alloc (objalloc.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22175 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10453 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10453&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22175] New: memory allocation failure in _objalloc_alloc (objalloc.c)

Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10452 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10452&action=edit stacktrace NOTE: it

[Bug binutils/22176] New: memory allocation failure in print_symbol (nm.c)

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10454 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10454&action=edit stacktrace NOTE: it may be a false positive On

[Bug binutils/22174] memory allocation failure in objalloc.c (_objalloc_alloc)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22174 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10451 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10451&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22174] New: memory allocation failure in objalloc.c (_objalloc_alloc)

Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10450 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10450&action=edit stacktrace NOTE: it

[Bug binutils/22173] New: assertion failure in dwarf2.c

: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10449 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10449&action=edit testcase On master compiled today. # nm -V GNU nm (Gen

[Bug binutils/22172] New: assertion failure in elf64-x86-64.c

: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10448 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10448&action=edit testcase On master compiled today. # nm -V GNU nm (Gen

[Bug binutils/22171] heap-based buffer overflow in _bfd_safe_read_leb128 (libbfd.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22171 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10447 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10447&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22171] New: heap-based buffer overflow in _bfd_safe_read_leb128 (libbfd.c)

: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10446 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10446&action=edit stacktrace On

[Bug binutils/22170] heap-based buffer overflow in _bfd_x86_elf_get_synthetic_symtab (elfxx-x86.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22170 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10445 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10445&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22170] New: heap-based buffer overflow in _bfd_x86_elf_get_synthetic_symtab (elfxx-x86.c)

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10444 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10444&acti

[Bug binutils/22169] heap-based buffer overflow in read_1_byte (dwarf2.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22169 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10443 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10443&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22169] New: heap-based buffer overflow in read_1_byte (dwarf2.c)

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10442 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10442&action=edit stacktrace On master compiled today. # nm -V

[Bug binutils/22168] New: NULL pointer dereference in _bfd_x86_elf_get_synthetic_symtab (elfxx-x86.c)

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10440 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10440&action=edit sta

[Bug binutils/22168] NULL pointer dereference in _bfd_x86_elf_get_synthetic_symtab (elfxx-x86.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22168 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10441 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10441&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22167] NULL pointer dereference in scan_unit_for_symbols (dwarf2.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22167 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10439 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10439&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22167] New: NULL pointer dereference in scan_unit_for_symbols (dwarf2.c)

: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10438 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10438&action=edit stacktrace On

[Bug binutils/22166] big memory allocation failure

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22166 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10437 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10437&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22166] New: big memory allocation failure

: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10436 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10436&action=edit screenshot of the issue To reproduce: # nm -A -a -l -S -s --speci

[Bug binutils/22154] heap-based buffer overflow in get_line_filename_and_dirname (dwarf.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22154 --- Comment #2 from Agostino Sarubbo --- I can reproduce also with 2.28 and 2.28.1: (valgrind info of 2.28.1) ==30328== Invalid read of size 1 ==30328==at 0x4370F2: get_line_filename_and_dirname (dwarf.c:4091) ==30328==by 0x4370F2: d

[Bug binutils/22154] heap-based buffer overflow in get_line_filename_and_dirname (dwarf.c)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22154 --- Comment #1 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 10424 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10424&action=edit testcase -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/22154] New: heap-based buffer overflow in get_line_filename_and_dirname (dwarf.c)

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 10423 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10423&action=edit stacktr

[Bug binutils/21379] New: readelf: signed integer overflow

: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Hello, this is compiled from master. I don't know if previous version are affected. # readelf -a $FILE /tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-/work/binutils/bin

[Bug binutils/21378] New: readelf: shift exponent too large for unsigned long

Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Hello, this is compiled from master. I don't know if previous version are affected. # readelf -a $FILE /tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-

[Bug binutils/21377] New: readelf: NULL pointer dereference in print_symbol_for_build_attribute (readelf.c)

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 9990 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9990&acti

[Bug binutils/21345] readelf: memory allocation failure

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21345 --- Comment #3 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 9989 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9989&action=edit stacktrace Hello Nick, I compiled from master right now and I'm able to reproduce the issue (but it can

[Bug ld/21348] odr-violation in libiberty/safe-ctype.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21348 --- Comment #2 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Indeed, this is what I did, but since I didn't reproduced this problem with 2.26 and 2.28 I decided to report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug ld/21342] two member access within null pointer

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21342 --- Comment #8 from Agostino Sarubbo --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) > Unfortunately even with the test.o file and the linker command line I still > cannot reproduce the failure. :-( I need to admit that I missed to say tha

[Bug ld/21342] two member access within null pointer

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21342 --- Comment #6 from Agostino Sarubbo --- The current output is about the current git version of binutils. So the problem is reproducible with both 2.28 and master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug ld/21342] two member access within null pointer

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21342 --- Comment #5 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 9966 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9966&action=edit test.o -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/21342] two member access within null pointer

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21342 --- Comment #4 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Created attachment 9965 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9965&action=edit cc --save-temps -v test.c -o test -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for th

[Bug ld/21342] two member access within null pointer

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21342 --- Comment #2 from Agostino Sarubbo --- Hi Nick, (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) >a. For which architecture(s) did you encounter the problem ? x86_64 >b. What was the full linker command line that was in use ? Where do I

[Bug ld/21348] New: odr-violation in libiberty/safe-ctype.c

Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- During the compilation of libpng, while the configure script made some test I hit a build failure: configure:3313: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -mtune=generic -march=x86

[Bug binutils/21345] New: readelf: memory allocation failure

: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 9962 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9962&action=edit stacktrace Hello, on binutils 2.28, compiled with clang-4: # readelf -

[Bug binutils/21344] New: readelf: another heap-based buffer overflow in byte_get_little_endian (elfcomm.c)

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 9961 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9961&action=edit sta

[Bug binutils/21343] New: readelf: heap-based buffer overflow in byte_get_little_endian (elfcomm.c)

Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Hello, on binutils 2.28, compiled with clang-4: # readelf -a $FILE ==20283==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer

[Bug ld/21342] New: two member access within null pointer

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ago at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- To reproduce this bug you need to compile binutils with -fsanitize=undefined # echo "int main () { return 0; }" > test.c # cc t