Re: [Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-04-06 Thread Tristan Gingold
> On 05 Apr 2016, at 16:05, nickc at redhat dot com > wrote: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 > > --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- > Hi Tristan, > >> you have committed unrelated chunks (pe-dll, aarch64/simulator.c) > > > Argh! Why does git do this ? I am sur

Re: [Bug gas/19910] Unsigned arithmetic and %hi()/%low() operators

2016-04-06 Thread Tristan Gingold
> On 05 Apr 2016, at 18:04, orlandoarias at gmail dot com > wrote: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19910 > > --- Comment #2 from Orlando Arias --- > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Greetings: > >> This happens because the assembler does not support U as a su

Re: [Bug ld/19623] regression: erroneous relocation for symbols in absolute section (vma == 0)

2016-03-15 Thread Tristan Gingold
> On 15 Mar 2016, at 11:55, Nick Clifton wrote: > >> Yes, the backport is fine with me. >> >> Can the OP commit it ? > > I think not, so I have taken the liberty and applied it myself. Thanks! ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org htt

Re: [Bug ld/19623] regression: erroneous relocation for symbols in absolute section (vma == 0)

2016-03-15 Thread Tristan Gingold
> On 14 Mar 2016, at 18:46, nickc at redhat dot com > wrote: > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19623 > > --- Comment #13 from Nick Clifton --- > Hi, > >> So downstream [1] is asking for an inclusion into the 2.26 branch. >> Considering >> the regression was first visible i

Re: Compilation fails on Darwin 11.4.2 in darwin-nat.c

2015-07-22 Thread Tristan Gingold
> On 22 Jul 2015, at 19:41, Joshua Kordani wrote: > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > darwin-nat.c: In function ‘darwin_ptrace’: > darwin-nat.c:259: warning: format ‘%x’ expects type ‘unsigned int’, but > argument 5 has type ‘caddr_t’ > darwin-nat.c: In function ‘darwin_resume’: > darwi

Re: [Bug binutils/17122] New: OSX 10.9 build failure

2014-07-08 Thread Tristan Gingold
On 07 Jul 2014, at 18:08, andrew.smirnov at gmail dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17122 > >Bug ID: 17122 > Summary: OSX 10.9 build failure > Product: binutils > Version: 2.25 (HEAD) >Status: NEW > S

Re: Installation fail on OS X Mavericks

2014-04-15 Thread Tristan Gingold
On 13 Apr 2014, at 08:01, Pritish Kamat wrote: > Hi, > > Performing the following gives gprof: command not found. > ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/bin/ --enable-targets=all --disable-nls > make > sudo make install > > What could be the problem? Help. This works for me. Note that gprof is n

Re: question on gnu ld on mac

2013-06-20 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Jun 19, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Merijn van de Klundert wrote: > Dear member or developer of binutils, > > I've tried to install gnu ld on my macbook (I need this to compile a certain > makefile, which containts options that are not recognized by the linker of > snow leopard. This makefile runs

Re: [Bug admin/15345] New: [2.23.2 regression] binutils-2.23.2 tarball doesn't build without makeinfo

2013-04-08 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:27 AM, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15345 > > Bug #: 15345 > Summary: [2.23.2 regression] binutils-2.23.2 tarball doesn't >build without makeinfo > Product: binutils >

Re: objdump binary for Mac OS X?

2012-10-03 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Oct 2, 2012, at 9:01 PM, Andrew Pennebaker wrote: > Could someone produce a Mac binary for the objdump program? Apple provides > otool, but I'd prefer to use objdump, to keep my toolchain as multiplatform > as possible. > > I know that objdump is part of the binutils package, but when I ins

Re: error compiling binutils-2.22 with clang v2.9

2012-03-07 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Mar 7, 2012, at 2:34 AM, Roy Batty wrote: > To Whom It May Concern: > > i don't know if your project even has an interest in being compiled with > anything other than GCC @ this point in time, but here is an error I found > when trying to make binutils with clang. note that this was perfor

Re: [Bug binutils/13591] New: gas/struc-symbol.h:98:21: error: duplicate member 'sy_flags'

2012-01-12 Thread Tristan Gingold
Hi, this patch should fix this issue. Thank you for the report, Tristan. 2012-01-12 Tristan Gingold * config/obj-coff.h (sy_obj): Rename macro to avoid a name conflict. diff --git a/gas/config/obj-coff.h b/gas/config/obj-coff.h index fb9c6be..ff5548e 100644 --- a/gas/config/obj

Re: [Bug binutils/13591] gas/struc-symbol.h:98:21: error: duplicate member 'sy_flags'

2012-01-12 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Jan 12, 2012, at 9:27 AM, i.nixman at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13591 > > --- Comment #2 from niXman 2012-01-12 08:27:25 > UTC --- > Hi, > > I got it. > I am wondering whether this bug is fixed, and if so, when? I am testing a patch. Stay tune!

Re: [Bug binutils/13591] New: gas/struc-symbol.h:98:21: error: duplicate member 'sy_flags'

2012-01-12 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Jan 12, 2012, at 3:32 AM, i.nixman at gmail dot com wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13591 > > Bug #: 13591 > Summary: gas/struc-symbol.h:98:21: error: duplicate member >'sy_flags' > Product: binutils > Versi

Re: [Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in section

2012-01-06 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:37 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 > > --- Comment #3 from ka5427-536 at online dot de 2012-01-05 08:37:27 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #2) >> On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote: >> >

Re: [Bug ld/13561] AIX link failure: RLD address not contained in section

2012-01-05 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Jan 5, 2012, at 9:11 AM, ka5427-536 at online dot de wrote: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13561 > > --- Comment #1 from ka5427-536 at online dot de 2012-01-05 08:11:26 UTC --- > sandbox@rs6k> nm -C partial.o > > 0148 T .bar() > T .foo() > 0078 W .std::a

Re: binutils-2.21.53 bugs

2011-09-26 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Sep 26, 2011, at 5:42 PM, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Tristan, > >> I think that currently we always use i18n macro _("xx") for all our strings >> - or we are supposed to. >> As you have noticed, this is sometimes useless, particularly when the string >> is not subject to >> translation. >> >

Re: binutils-2.21.53 bugs

2011-09-26 Thread Tristan Gingold
Hi, first thank you for this extensive review. I think that currently we always use i18n macro _("xx") for all our strings - or we are supposed to. As you have noticed, this is sometimes useless, particularly when the string is not subject to translation. Maintainers, must we not use _() macro

Re: Wrong release date for binutils 2.21 - release date is 12/08/11

2011-03-29 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Mar 29, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Hulin, Gerlinde (E D EA SOL D TC1) wrote: > Hello, > I have seen that the release date for binutils 2.21 on > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils is in the future > > 12/08/11 09:58AM [GMT] 18,742,991 binutils-2.21.tar.bz2 > 12/08/11 09:58AM [GMT] 194 binutils-2.21.ta

Re: Unable to use objcopy on AIX

2010-11-18 Thread Tristan Gingold
> I was trying to use the objcopy with following arguments to copy the debug > information to another file.. > bash-3.2#./objcopy --only-keep-debug testvolumeinfocollector > testvolumeinfocollector.dbg > BFD: testvolumeinfocollector: Unrecognized storage class 0 for *ABS* symbol > `volumeinfocollec

Re: [ARM/THUMB] Incorrect branch generated for long calls

2010-06-11 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Jun 11, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 15:35 +0200, Rafaël Carré wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just met a possible bug in binutils 2.20.1 when mixing ARM/Thumb code >> under some conditions. >> >> I wouldn't mind a confirmation that it's a real bug before openi

Re: Binutils Build error when the target is arm-linux

2010-02-23 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Feb 24, 2010, at 4:27 AM, thinke365 wrote: > > my binutils version is 2.20. > this error is produced, since the absent of parenthesis makes a warnning, > while the compile regards warnnings as errors, > this problem can be solved in two ways: > 1. add parenthesis to line 2489 > 2. use --disab

Re: [Bug gas/10856] [2.20 regression] gas creates wrong code which results in a test failure in libcrypto++'s sha2 test

2009-12-14 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Dec 13, 2009, at 6:55 PM, david-sarah at jacaranda dot org wrote: > > --- Additional Comments From david-sarah at jacaranda dot org 2009-12-13 > 17:55 --- > Any indication of when this fix is likely to get into a release? The more OS > distributions as 2.20 goes into, the more prob

Re: [Bug ld/9841] avr-ld crashes when -relax is used with ATMega8535 target

2009-02-19 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Feb 18, 2009, at 9:11 PM, eric dot weddington at atmel dot com wrote: --- Additional Comments From eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-02-18 20:11 --- Nick, Can this patch also be applied to the 2.19 branch? Sure. ___ bug-bi

Re: doc update for 2.19.1?

2009-02-03 Thread Tristan Gingold
On Feb 3, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Karl Berry wrote: It seems http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ should be regenerated for the new 2.19.1? AFAIK the doc hasn't changed between 2.19 and 2.19.1 except the version number. I plan to update the web pages soon. Please be patient! Tristan.