[Bug ld/32584] ld.bfd slowdown linking some linux kernels

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32584 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/32238] Performance issues found from binutils version '2.36' version while usage of function 'lang_output_section_statement_lookup'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/29259] ld -r may create reloc sections with unordered relocs again

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29259 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug libsframe/32589] function start address is zero in SFrame section dump

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug gas/31654] gas: Bad SFrame information when assembling with listing

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31654 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libsframe/32589] New: function start address is zero in SFrame section dump

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32589 Bug ID: 32589 Summary: function start address is zero in SFrame section dump Product: binutils Version: 2.45 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug ld/32584] ld.bfd slowdown linking some linux kernels

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32584 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |matz at suse dot de Ever co

[Bug binutils/32586] riscv objdump abort

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv32-elf, |

[Bug binutils/32586] New: riscv objdump abort

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586 Bug ID: 32586 Summary: riscv objdump abort Product: binutils Version: 2.45 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assi

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab --- But the others are apparently not triggering the ksh bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #10) > But of course, if it is at the end of the here doc anyway, it could also be > moved out and called as a regular command after it. True - but there are other

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab --- But of course, if it is at the end of the here doc anyway, it could also be moved out and called as a regular command after it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bu

[Bug ld/32580] [2.44 regression] Non-bash shell breaks many default linker scripts

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32580 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- Because this is part of a here doc where func would be just a literal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.