https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #28 from Andreas Schwab ---
"This means that the sections can still be fetched using aligned reads" is
obviously wrong. The alignment requirements for the hsot are completely
independent of the alignment requirements of the target
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #27 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #26)
> Would passing bed->s->log_file_align instead of 0 have a large impact on
> object file size ? (My guess is that it would not unless the object file
> has a ver
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #26 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #22)
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #20)
> > Plus, if I have read Jan's v2 patch correctly, sections in object files will
> > still be aligned, but just alig
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919
Bug 30919 depends on bug 31887, which changed state.
Bug 31887 Summary: gas confuses an memory operand as immediate value (no
diagnostic) for various x86 opcodes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31887
What|Remove
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31887
Jan Beulich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31887
--- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9d02cb7fe0d636be390e43e06f39b30b834e89e4
commit 9d02cb7fe0d636be390e43e06f39b30b834e89e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #25 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #24)
> The target has no relevance when the host is reading the section contents.
I'm confused; it would help if you provided some more detail of what exactly
your
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #24 from Andreas Schwab ---
The target has no relevance when the host is reading the section contents.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
--- Comment #9 from Claudio Luck ---
The problem is, on QNAP I get a different result than with Qemu:
Linux version 4.2.8 (root@mini-builder-05) (gcc version 4.8.2 20131014
(prerelease) (crosstool-NG linaro-1.13.1-4.8-2013.10 - Linaro GCC 201
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
--- Comment #8 from Claudio Luck ---
I hope this is what you asked for:
# In each of bullseye and bookworm images, called for both QEMU_PAGESIZE 4096
and 32768 I prepare two binaries with/without shared lib:
mkdir test
docker run -e "QEMU_CP
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #23 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #21)
> This is wrong in a cross environment. Alignment requirements differ between
> host and target.
Was my understanding then wrong that bed->s->log_file_align d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #22 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #20)
> Plus, if I have read Jan's v2 patch correctly, sections in object files will
> still be aligned, but just aligned to the architecture's minimum file
> alignment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #21 from Andreas Schwab ---
> Plus, if I have read Jan's v2 patch correctly, sections in object files will
> still be aligned, but just aligned to the architecture's minimum file
> alignment, rather than the sections specified alig
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29594
Nick Alcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Assignee|unassigned a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29594
Nix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nix at esperi dot org.uk
--- Comment #1 from Ni
16 matches
Mail list logo
