[Bug gprofng/32096] UBSAN issues in gprofng

2024-09-23 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32096 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug gprofng/32092] gprofng testsuite fails with -flto (ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed)

2024-09-23 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32092 Bug 32092 depends on bug 32096, which changed state. Bug 32096 Summary: UBSAN issues in gprofng https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32096 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.

2024-09-23 Thread sunyanhong2101 at phytium dot com.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 --- Comment #4 from Sun Yanhong --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #1) > The fix looks good to me. > > > For your Phytium machine, could you attach the output of: > perf list --details > and > cat /proc/cpuinfo > > Thank y

[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.

2024-09-23 Thread sunyanhong2101 at phytium dot com.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 Sun Yanhong changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15712|0 |1 is patch|

[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.

2024-09-23 Thread sunyanhong2101 at phytium dot com.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 --- Comment #3 from Sun Yanhong --- Created attachment 15716 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15716&action=edit The output of the command 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC li

[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.

2024-09-23 Thread sunyanhong2101 at phytium dot com.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 --- Comment #2 from Sun Yanhong --- Created attachment 15715 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15715&action=edit The output of the command 'perf list --details' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug gprofng/32200] gprofng is not compatible with the Phytium (CPU) platform.

2024-09-23 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32200 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|vladimir.me

[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

2024-09-23 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 --- Comment #16 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9e0840deed38b0a52a895c0abd3d5b0adacbc8a5 commit 9e0840deed38b0a52a895c0abd3d5b0adacbc8a5 A

[Bug gas/32204] New: x86_64-pc-mingw64 CFI test failures when compression is enabled

2024-09-23 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32204 Bug ID: 32204 Summary: x86_64-pc-mingw64 CFI test failures when compression is enabled Product: binutils Version: 2.44 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/32191] --rosegment places .note.gnu.property in executable PT_LOAD segment for -z separate-code

2024-09-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32191 Bug 32191 depends on bug 32190, which changed state. Bug 32190 Summary: [2.44 Regression] pr22393 test failures https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug ld/32190] [2.44 Regression] pr22393 test failures

2024-09-23 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32190 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/32198] unsupported target loongarch64-unknown-elf

2024-09-23 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32198 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- This has been corrected by commit f09a9dd319e in the gcc repository, needs to be merged to binutils-gdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/32201] [display html] Do not suppress zero valued metrics

2024-09-23 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32201 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Assignee|vladimir.mez

[Bug gprofng/32201] New: [display html] Do not suppress zero valued metrics

2024-09-23 Thread ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32201 Bug ID: 32201 Summary: [display html] Do not suppress zero valued metrics Product: binutils Version: 2.43.1 Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component