[Bug gas/32022] Assembler shouldn't accept invalid TLS instructions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32022 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/32017] Linker failed to check invalid TLS sequence

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32017 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/32123] Linker should check all invalid @TLSCALL usage

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32123 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org See Also|

[Bug ld/31982] [2.43 Regression] mir 2.17 build failure during an LTO enabled build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #12) > sorry, I didn't mention the architectures. It fails on aarch64-linux-gnu, > arm-linux-gnueabihf, arm-linux-gnueabi, alpha-linux-gnu, powerpc-linux-gnu > and sparc

[Bug ld/31982] [2.43 Regression] mir 2.17 build failure during an LTO enabled build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982 --- Comment #12 from Matthias Klose --- sorry, I didn't mention the architectures. It fails on aarch64-linux-gnu, arm-linux-gnueabihf, arm-linux-gnueabi, alpha-linux-gnu, powerpc-linux-gnu and sparc64-linux-gnu. Other architectures work ok, se

[Bug ld/31982] [2.43 Regression] mir 2.17 build failure during an LTO enabled build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #9) > Created attachment 15688 [details] > log of the build Does it fail on x86-64? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32123] New: Linker should check all invalid @TLSCALL usage

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32123 Bug ID: 32123 Summary: Linker should check all invalid @TLSCALL usage Product: binutils Version: 2.44 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compone

[Bug ld/31982] [2.43 Regression] mir 2.17 build failure during an LTO enabled build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Klose --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/14/lto-wrapper OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1 Target: aarch64-linux-gnu Con

[Bug ld/31982] [2.43 Regression] mir 2.17 build failure during an LTO enabled build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982 --- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose --- Created attachment 15688 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15688&action=edit log of the build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/31982] [2.43 Regression] mir 2.17 build failure during an LTO enabled build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #5) > fails with > > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccijjp3k.ltrans5.ltrans.o: in function > `StaticDisplayConfig_nonexistent_config_file_is_no_error_Test::TestBody()': > /usr/src/mi

[Bug libctf/32093] -Walloc-size warning in ctf-hash.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32093 --- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=35e273526b7d4e345bb77a042af093508dad57f4 commit 35e273526b7d4e345bb77a042af093508dad57f4

[Bug ld/31982] [2.43 Regression] mir 2.17 build failure during an LTO enabled build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com -- Yo

[Bug ld/31982] [2.43 Regression] mir 2.17 build failure during an LTO enabled build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from Matthias Klo