[Bug gprofng/32092] gprofng testsuite fails with ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32092 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/32092] gprofng testsuite fails with ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32092 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- I can reproduce it with C{,XX}FLAGS="-O2 -flto=jobserver" but not without LTO. Looking at the differences. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/31116] gprofng test fails with "comparison of results in synprog failed" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31116 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/32092] gprofng testsuite fails with ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32092 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gprofng testsuit efails |gprofng testsuite fails

[Bug binutils/15435] Gold rejects undefined weak hidden symbol

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15435 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gold/32071] undefined weak hidden function symbols resolves to garbage with PIE

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32071 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug libctf/32093] New: -Walloc-size warning in ctf-hash.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32093 Bug ID: 32093 Summary: -Walloc-size warning in ctf-hash.c Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libctf

[Bug gprofng/32092] New: gprofng testsuit efails with ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32092 Bug ID: 32092 Summary: gprofng testsuit efails with ERROR: comparison of results in synprog failed Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severit

[Bug gas/32091] binutils, gas/config/tc-i386-ginsn.c:495, error: ‘ginsn_func’ may be used uninitialized

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32091 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug gas/32091] New: binutils, gas/config/tc-i386-ginsn.c:495, error: ‘ginsn_func’ may be used uninitialized

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32091 Bug ID: 32091 Summary: binutils, gas/config/tc-i386-ginsn.c:495, error: ‘ginsn_func’ may be used uninitialized Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug gold/32071] undefined weak hidden function symbols resolves to garbage with PIE

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32071 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Here is the v2 patch: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-August/136395.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/32071] undefined weak hidden function symbols resolves to garbage with PIE

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32071 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2024-08-17 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/31795] ld.bfd makes ELFs of type ET_EXEC for PIEs when load address is non-0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795 Nightishaman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nighti at nighti dot dev --- Comment #

[Bug gold/32071] undefined weak hidden function symbols resolves to garbage with PIE

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32071 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|undefined weak hidden |undefined weak hidden |fu