https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
when building with 14, I get different issues:
/usr/bin/ld:
CMakeFiles/mir_unit_tests.dir/frontend_wayland/test_desktop_file_manager.cpp.o:
in function
`DesktopFileManager_can_resolve_from_valid_flatpak_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Summary|[2.43 Regression
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31881
--- Comment #18 from Rostislav Krasny ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #17)
> Created attachment 15626 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> OK, what do you think of this version ?
>
> It incorporates Rostilav's suggeste
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
Bug ID: 31982
Summary: [2.43 Regression] ld failure during an LTO enabled
build
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31956
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31956
>
> --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31956
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> But the linker itself, via --wrap will create a reference to the symbol.
> With PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY the compiler is free to elide the symbol,
> so IMO that's i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31956
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #14)
> > Sorry, one more question: richi's comment at
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24406#c10 made me wo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31956
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #14)
> Sorry, one more question: richi's comment at
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24406#c10 made me wonder.
>
> If I modify https://sourceware.org/bugzil
