[Bug ld/31300] ld: warning: x.so has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31300 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug gas/31284] scfi: untraceable control flow should be a hard error

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31284 --- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=91cdbed4d7b3acff951e0f21008a7775a7f23c20 commit 91cdbed4d7b3acff951e0f21008a7775a7f23c2

[Bug ld/31300] New: ld: warning: x.so has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31300 Bug ID: 31300 Summary: ld: warning: x.so has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions Product: binutils Version: 2.43 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug gas/30418] use of labels that happen to match register names or keywords

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30418 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com -- You a

[Bug gas/30336] The GNU Assembler has bugs in Intel syntax

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30336 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com -- You a

[Bug gas/12240] offset can't be used as label in Intel syntax

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12240 Gabriel Ravier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gabravier at gmail dot com -- You a

[Bug ld/31299] Misleading message with --fatal-warnings

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31299 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Misleading message with |Misleading message with |

[Bug ld/31299] New: Misleading message with --warn-execstack --fatal-warnings

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31299 Bug ID: 31299 Summary: Misleading message with --warn-execstack --fatal-warnings Product: binutils Version: 2.43 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 --- Comment #6 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1b06334552f33015a6293571e9381d43dec3a5d3 commit 1b06334552f33015a6293571e9381d43dec3a5d3 Au

[Bug binutils/31250] Stripping Rust static libraries fails because of overly zealous illegal path check

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/31250] Stripping Rust static libraries fails because of overly zealous illegal path check

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250 --- Comment #8 from Amyspark --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6) > > Actually that is a very interesting point. Does MSVC require that the path > inside the lib point to an object that already exists or one that could > exist, sho

[Bug binutils/31250] Stripping Rust static libraries fails because of overly zealous illegal path check

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250 --- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c8567a87a60cf5820ebc5d98c025e91e2735f373 commit c8567a87a60cf5820ebc5d98c025e91e2735f3

[Bug binutils/31250] Stripping Rust static libraries fails because of overly zealous illegal path check

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31250 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Amyspark from comment #4) > Applied the patch on top of mingw-w64-binutils (commit > c2aee7d89488d9402315d59d25852dff258c9eba), and can confirm it works as > expected. OK, that is good news.