[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options

2024-01-24 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/31289] --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options

2024-01-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Also it looks strange: $ ld.bfd --fatal-warnings -z bad-option -e 0 /dev/null ld.bfd: warning: -z bad-option ignored $ echo $? 1 Why do we say "warning: -z bad-option ignored" when it is an err

[Bug ld/31289] New: --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options

2024-01-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31289 Bug ID: 31289 Summary: --fatal-warnings doesn't work for command-line options Product: binutils Version: 2.43 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug binutils/31283] windmc (s390x) fails with: parser: syntax error

2024-01-24 Thread rjones at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31283 --- Comment #4 from Richard Jones --- v2: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2024-January/132096.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/31283] windmc (s390x) fails with: parser: syntax error

2024-01-24 Thread dan at danny dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31283 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horak --- LGTM(In reply to Richard Jones from comment #2) > Created attachment 15329 [details] > 0001-binutils-windmc-Parse-input-correctly-on-big-endian-.patch > > Potential fix LGTM, thanks. -- You are receiving t

[Bug binutils/31283] windmc (s390x) fails with: parser: syntax error

2024-01-24 Thread rjones at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31283 Richard Jones changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjones at redhat dot com --- Comment