[Bug ld/31067] symbols eliminated by --gc-sections still trigger warnings for gnu.warning.SYM

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com

[Bug binutils/31077] objcopy has non-deterministic output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31077 Yannik Sembritzki changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNC

[Bug binutils/31077] objcopy has non-deterministic output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31077 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug binutils/31077] objcopy has non-deterministic output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31077 --- Comment #3 from Yannik Sembritzki --- Reading `man ar`, I now finally understand what `archive` means in this context. I didn't quite get that before, and thought it described the "archive" of sections contained within the object file. Oop

[Bug binutils/31077] objcopy has non-deterministic output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31077 Yannik Sembritzki changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|objcopy |objcopy has |--

[Bug binutils/31077] objcopy --enable-deterministic-archives has non-deterministic output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31077 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- --enable-deterministic-archives is only related to archive members. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/31077] objcopy --enable-deterministic-archives has non-deterministic output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31077 --- Comment #1 from Yannik Sembritzki --- This is most likely caused by some timestamp, as using /usr/bin/faketime '2020-01-01' objcopy results in a deterministic build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t