https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30850
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Only a few targets use [...] for something different (see NEED_INDEX_OPERATOR
and md_need_index_operator), otherwise GAS treats it as equivalent to (...).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30851
Bug ID: 30851
Summary: gas arm: Accepts additional operands for `lsr`
instruction
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30850
Bug ID: 30850
Summary: gas arm: Strange behaviors while handling operator
`[]`.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30849
Bug ID: 30849
Summary: gas x86-64: Operand size prefix incorrectly parsed as
operand in `prefetch` Instruction
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30848
Bug ID: 30848
Summary: gas x86-64: Internal error occurs while handling `bnd`
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844
--- Comment #4 from Nelson Chu ---
> The --emit-relocs should switch to preserve the original
> relocation type, including R_RISCV_CALL_PLT(etc),
> R_RISCV_RELAX, and R_RISCV_ALIGN.
Looks reasonable, so based on this rule when setting --emit-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30840
Andreas K. Huettel changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844
--- Comment #3 from Palmer Dabbelt ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #2)
> (In reply to Palmer Dabbelt from comment #1)
> > Nelson and I are just chatting about this. It's not intentional, but we
> > also don't quite know what the ri
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30840
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703
--- Comment #15 from Nick Clifton ---
I should note however that we do not normally make further releases from a
branch unless there is an important bug that needs to be fixed. Given that it
is possible to work around this build problem, I wo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703
--- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #12)
> (In reply to vvinayag from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #10)
> > > I backed out the offending patch.
> >
> > Is it possible to backport
11 matches
Mail list logo