https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844
--- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song ---
(In reply to Palmer Dabbelt from comment #1)
> Nelson and I are just chatting about this. It's not intentional, but we
> also don't quite know what the right answer is here: there's some relocs we
> can to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844
Palmer Dabbelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jnoorman at igalia dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrtc27 at jrtc27 dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30844
Bug ID: 30844
Summary: ld riscv: --emit-relocs does not retain the original
relocation type
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: norm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703
--- Comment #13 from vvinayag at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #12)
> (In reply to vvinayag from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #10)
> > > I backed out the offending patch.
> >
> > Is it possible t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759
Ruud van der Pas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
