[Bug binutils/30758] ODR violations in opcodes dir

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||22395 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewa

[Bug ld/30698] ld test 'Run pr23169b' fails

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30698 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/30758] ODR violations in opcodes dir

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug binutils/30702] objcopy and strip invalidate the effect of ld option --no-insert-timestamp

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30702 --- Comment #5 from Christian Franke --- Yes this works. I obviously missed that, sorry for the noise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/30758] New: ODR violations in opcodes dir

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30758 Bug ID: 30758 Summary: ODR violations in opcodes dir Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug ld/30698] ld test 'Run pr23169b' fails

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30698 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=51dd9e7c4cab13748f31f6575aed0672f03d6710 commit 51dd9e7c4cab13748f31f6575aed0672

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #15 from John David Anglin --- dave@mx3210:~/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld$ gdb tmpdir/alias GNU gdb (Debian 13.2-1) 13.2 Copyright (C) 2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later

[Bug ld/30756] ld: -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs goes OOM on i586 link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug binutils/30702] objcopy and strip invalidate the effect of ld option --no-insert-timestamp

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30702 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/30756] ld: -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs goes OOM on i586 link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756 --- Comment #1 from Adam Majer --- The binary objects in the 2nd command line is about 60MB, compressed, so doesn't fit in bugzilla. But you can download it from, https://w3.suse.de/~amajer/ld/ld.tar.bz2 -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug ld/30756] New: ld: -Wl, -z, pack-relative-relocs goes OOM on i586 link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30756 Bug ID: 30756 Summary: ld: -Wl,-z,pack-relative-relocs goes OOM on i586 link Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compone

[Bug gas/30755] RFE: z80: enable OBJ_COMPLEX_RELOC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30755 H. Peter Anvin changed: What|Removed |Added Target||z80-* -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug gas/30755] New: RFE: z80: enable OBJ_COMPLEX_RELOC

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30755 Bug ID: 30755 Summary: RFE: z80: enable OBJ_COMPLEX_RELOC Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Compon

[Bug gas/30752] RFE: Z80: allow relaxed syntax of instructions using register A

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30752 --- Comment #1 from H. Peter Anvin --- At least for the basic Z80 instruction set this is applicable to the following instructions: Make "A," optional for: ADD ADC ABC Optionally allow "A," for: SUB AND OR XOR CP -- You are receiving this m

[Bug gas/30754] RFE: Z80: allow ? in symbol names

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30754 H. Peter Anvin changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Target|

[Bug gas/30754] New: RFE: Z80: allow ? in symbol names

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30754 Bug ID: 30754 Summary: RFE: Z80: allow ? in symbol names Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: g

[Bug gas/30753] RFE: Z80: enable ! as line separator character

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30753 H. Peter Anvin changed: What|Removed |Added Target||z80-* -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug gas/30753] New: RFE: Z80: enable ! as line separator character

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30753 Bug ID: 30753 Summary: RFE: Z80: enable ! as line separator character Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

[Bug gas/30752] RFE: Z80: allow relaxed syntax of instructions using register A

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30752 H. Peter Anvin changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.42 (HEAD) Target|

[Bug gas/30752] New: RFE: Z80: allow relaxed syntax of instructions using register A

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30752 Bug ID: 30752 Summary: RFE: Z80: allow relaxed syntax of instructions using register A Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: e

[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #14 from Sam James --- OK, I was wrong. I can reproduce it with our normal toolchain too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.