https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10489
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10409
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10372
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sources dot redhat.c |amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10372
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8f401e317af76b1f55fa05d5d6903814c2a5a0bf
commit 8f401e317af76b1f55fa05d5d6903
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4638
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Sorry, we have just too many bugzilla entries to handle. It's like this.
Everyone who has looked at this bugzilla entry has decided "No, I won't fix
this one today". You also have decided, "It's not worth m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at
oracle
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521
Bug ID: 29521
Summary: man pages are not in the release tarball
Product: binutils
Version: 2.39
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10365
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10356
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10317
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4638
--- Comment #2 from Axel Heider ---
Well, you have a point there - but don't you think emitting at least a warning
here makes sense as this is a corner case one can run into by accident?
Emitting non-working code seems not really useful either.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10259
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9862
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7061
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6468
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6747
Bug 6747 depends on bug 6446, which changed state.
Bug 6446 Summary: Handling of EF_FRV_PIC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6446
What|Removed |Added
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6446
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5305
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4928
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4646
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4638
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3163
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded
Comment #3 on issue 47637 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_nm: Crash in
filter_symbols
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47637#c3
This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It has been open
Updates:
Labels: Deadline-Approaching
Comment #2 on issue 47792 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objcopy: Out-of-memory
in fuzz_objcopy
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47792#c2
This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically
derestricted
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29519
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Fixed for arm with
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-August/122587.html, but need
something similar for aarch64.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29517
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Buettner ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> Is this the sort of patch you had in mind ?
>
> I have not regression tested it yet, but I thought that it might be worth
> checking with you that this i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29519
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #6 from Richard Ea
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29519
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
> I am currently testing this patch which I think should fix the problem.
Oops - sorry Richard - I missed that you were working on this...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29519
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29519
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
The slightly strange thing is that the front-end parser passes the entire
buffer to a directive statement, unlike md_assemble which is just passed a
single statement. It's not at all clear why that is.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29517
--- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler ---
(lgtm on paper!)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3132
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ld |gas
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
T
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29519
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29517
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29517
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29519
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
There are more directives that have the same problem, because every directive
needs to do its own parsing.
$ echo '.cpu generic ;' | aarch64-suse-linux-as
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29519
Bug ID: 29519
Summary: .unreq does not handle line separator characters as
such
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priori
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505
--- Comment #11 from Ralf Habacker ---
Created attachment 14295
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14295&action=edit
2. Screenshot from running strace
This difference is repeated very often after the difference from the f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505
--- Comment #10 from Ralf Habacker ---
Created attachment 14294
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14294&action=edit
Screenshot from comparing strace output
The attached screenshot shows clear differences between running
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29505
--- Comment #9 from Ralf Habacker ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8)
> Would you mind trying a small test ? Does this patch make any difference to
> the performance ?
No, unfortunately that is not the case.
[ 329s] extracting d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29517
--- Comment #1 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to Kevin Buettner from comment #0)
> Note that there's no DW_AT_type attribute (which would specify the return
> type) for the munmap subprogram. As I understand it, this causes the return
> type t
41 matches
Mail list logo