[Bug binutils/29389] pe renaming implib breaks bfd/cache.c reopening of closed archives

2022-08-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|amodra at gmail d

[Bug binutils/29389] pe renaming implib breaks bfd/cache.c reopening of closed archives

2022-08-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Failed assertions in|pe renaming implib breaks

[Bug binutils/29389] Failed assertions in bfd/cofflink.c and bfd/coff-x86_64.c during the linking stage (MSYS2 MinGW64)

2022-08-01 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-02 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug binutils/29435] Building openblas with binutils 2.38 leads to "ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned"

2022-08-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 14248 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14248&action=edit A patch Try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29435] Building openblas with binutils 2.38 leads to "ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned"

2022-08-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- [hjl@g

[Bug binutils/29435] Building openblas with binutils 2.38 leads to "ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned"

2022-08-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 --- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- We've had this issue across a bunch of different systems. Mine has Debian GLIBC 2.31-13+deb11u3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29389] Failed assertions in bfd/cofflink.c and bfd/coff-x86_64.c during the linking stage (MSYS2 MinGW64)

2022-08-01 Thread luca.bacci at outlook dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389 --- Comment #17 from Luca Bacci --- Beyond that, would you accept a patch to increase the cache size on Windows? It could help in improving performance -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29389] Failed assertions in bfd/cofflink.c and bfd/coff-x86_64.c during the linking stage (MSYS2 MinGW64)

2022-08-01 Thread luca.bacci at outlook dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389 --- Comment #16 from Luca Bacci --- On MSYS2, bfd/cache.c:bfd_cache_max_open() returns 10, while on Linux it returns 128 (because HAVE_GETRLIMIT is defined) If I force the cache size on MSYS2 to a higher value, e.g. 500, then the issue goes a

[Bug binutils/29435] Building openblas with binutils 2.38 leads to "ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned"

2022-08-01 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com Stat

[Bug binutils/29435] Building openblas with binutils 2.38 leads to "ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned"

2022-08-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 --- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- I have put a copy of the faulty library (built on x86_64 linux) as well as the same one (built without `DYNAMIC_ARCH`) at this URL if someone wants to debug this issue further: https://www.dropbo

[Bug binutils/29435] Building openblas with binutils 2.38 leads to "ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned"

2022-08-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 --- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- How to reproduce: 1. Download and extract OpenBLAS-0.3.20 from https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/archive/v0.3.20.tar.gz 2. Run: $ DYNAMIC_ARCH=1 TARGET=CORE2 make libs netlib shared 3. Create

Issue 49024 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disas_ext-bfd_arch_i386: Abrt in i386_dis_printf

2022-08-01 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 49024 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_disas_ext-bfd_arch_i386: Abrt in i386_dis_printf https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=49024#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sherif

Issue 47177 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Timeout in fuzz_readelf

2022-08-01 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded Comment #3 on issue 47177 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Timeout in fuzz_readelf https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=47177#c3 This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It has been

[Bug binutils/29435] New: Building openblas with binutils 2.38 leads to "ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned"

2022-08-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29435 Bug ID: 29435 Summary: Building openblas with binutils 2.38 leads to "ELF load command address/offset not properly aligned" Product: binutils Version: 2.38 Status: NEW

[Bug binutils/29389] Failed assertions in bfd/cofflink.c and bfd/coff-x86_64.c during the linking stage (MSYS2 MinGW64)

2022-08-01 Thread luca.bacci at outlook dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389 --- Comment #15 from Luca Bacci --- Uh...how strange! One of the very first things that _bfd_coff_link_input_bfd() does is call obj_coff_external_syms() which seeks into the lib file and reads the external symbols table. When _bfd_coff_link_

[Bug binutils/29389] Failed assertions in bfd/cofflink.c and bfd/coff-x86_64.c during the linking stage (MSYS2 MinGW64)

2022-08-01 Thread luca.bacci at outlook dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29389 --- Comment #14 from Luca Bacci --- True! I'm going to investigate more... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29410] [display html] Argument "  0." isn't numeric in numeric gt (>)

2022-08-01 Thread kurt.goebel at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29410 Kurt Goebel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mai