[Bug binutils/29268] readelf misinterprets register rule inheritance from CIE to FDE

2022-06-20 Thread sevaa at sprynet dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29268 Vsevolod Alekseyev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNC

[Bug binutils/29250] readelf erases CIE initial register state

2022-06-20 Thread sevaa at sprynet dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29250 Vsevolod Alekseyev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sevaa at sprynet dot com --- Com

[Bug binutils/29270] New: Signed integer overflow with DW_FORM_udata

2022-06-20 Thread sevaa at sprynet dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29270 Bug ID: 29270 Summary: Signed integer overflow with DW_FORM_udata Product: binutils Version: 2.39 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Com

[Bug binutils/29267] New: readelf..info misreports DW_FORM_loclistx, DW_FORM_rnglistx

2022-06-20 Thread sevaa at sprynet dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29267 Bug ID: 29267 Summary: readelf..info misreports DW_FORM_loclistx, DW_FORM_rnglistx Product: binutils Version: 2.39 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

Issue 46099 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Unexpected-exit in xexit

2022-06-20 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 46099 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Unexpected-exit in xexit https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=46099#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted within 7

Issue 45897 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Timeout in fuzz_as

2022-06-20 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded Comment #3 on issue 45897 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Timeout in fuzz_as https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=45897#c3 This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It has been opened to

[Bug binutils/29266] readelf ..info misreports DW_FORM_strxN

2022-06-20 Thread sevaa at sprynet dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29266 --- Comment #1 from Vsevolod Alekseyev --- Additional info: when parsing the attribute at offset 0x54, the first strx one in the second CU, and fetch_indexed_string is invoked, the value of the this_set parameter, which I believe is supposed t

[Bug binutils/29268] New: readelf misinterprets register rule inheritance from CIE to FDE

2022-06-20 Thread sevaa at sprynet dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29268 Bug ID: 29268 Summary: readelf misinterprets register rule inheritance from CIE to FDE Product: binutils Version: 2.39 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug binutils/29266] New: readelf ..info misreports DW_FORM_strxN

2022-06-20 Thread sevaa at sprynet dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29266 Bug ID: 29266 Summary: readelf ..info misreports DW_FORM_strxN Product: binutils Version: 2.39 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2022-06-20 12:38 p.m., nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 > > --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- > Created attachment 14152 >-->

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #9 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2022-06-20 12:37 p.m., nickc at redhat dot com wrote: >> What is best way to transition without causing a lot of disruption? > How about a patch like the one I am about to upload ? It sets

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2022-06-20 11:42 a.m., hp at sourceware dot org wrote: > But I should add: I'd suggest to inspect whatever goes on with the linker > script; a "hosted" target reasonably shouldn't get data

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3) Hi Dave, > Unfortunately, this doesn't happen on hppa-linux because we have: > > /* It's not possible to enable GNU_stack notes since the kernel needs >    an ex

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 14152 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14152&action=edit Proposed Patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- But I should add: I'd suggest to inspect whatever goes on with the linker script; a "hosted" target reasonably shouldn't get data and code segments mixed. Maybe there's something to adjust there to m

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread hp at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3) > dave@mx3210:~/shmat$ gcc main.c -Wl,--no-warn-execstack > /usr/bin/ld: warning: a.out has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions That's a different warning a

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2022-06-20 7:13 a.m., nickc at redhat dot com wrote: >> On hppa-linux with kernel v5.18 and later, we don't need an executable >> stack for signal support but we still need it for gcc neste

[Bug ld/29263] /usr/bin/ld: warning: /usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/11/../../../hppa-linux-gnu/crtn.o: missing .note.GNU-stack section implies executable stack

2022-06-20 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29263 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug binutils/29262] A Potential Memory Leak Bug

2022-06-20 Thread 1157401338 at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29262 --- Comment #3 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2) > Fixed. Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.