[Bug gas/29012] gas: .set should copy st_size only if src's st_size is unset

2022-03-30 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29012 --- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song --- PATCH: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-March/120299.html LLVM integrated assembler has had a similar behavior since 2014-03: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a041ef1bd8905f0d58e

[Bug gas/29012] New: gas: .set should copy st_size only if src's st_size is unset

2022-03-30 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29012 Bug ID: 29012 Summary: gas: .set should copy st_size only if src's st_size is unset Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug gas/29004] various bugs in RISCV version

2022-03-30 Thread mark4th at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29004 --- Comment #1 from Mark Manning --- .macro VOCAB name, cfa, thread .header "\name", \cfa \cfa: nop jal x25, do_voc .quad \thread .fill 63, 8, 0 .quad vlink .set vlink, \cfa .endm the above macro is failing for the same reason

[Bug binutils/29010] libbfd has quadratic processing time for large debug info

2022-03-30 Thread travis.downs at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29010 --- Comment #1 from Travis Downs --- Sorry everywhere I said "abbrev" I should have probably said "DIE" instead. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29010] New: libbfd has quadratic processing time for large debug info

2022-03-30 Thread travis.downs at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29010 Bug ID: 29010 Summary: libbfd has quadratic processing time for large debug info Product: binutils Version: 2.38 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

Issue 43375 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_nm: Out-of-memory in fuzz_nm

2022-03-30 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 43375 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_nm: Out-of-memory in fuzz_nm https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=43375#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted within 7

[Bug ld/28399] Flag to order functions in a specific order based on order file

2022-03-30 Thread hiraditya at msn dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28399 --- Comment #4 from hiraditya --- Reference to bsd linker: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?ld The flag is: ``` --symbol-ordering-file=file Lay out sections in the order specified by file. ``` -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug ld/28399] Flag to order functions in a specific order based on order file

2022-03-30 Thread carlos at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28399 Carlos O'Donell changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement CC|

[Bug ld/28399] Flag to order functions in a specific order based on order file

2022-03-30 Thread carlos at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28399 Carlos O'Donell changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED