[Bug ld/28858] Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.38 Status|ASSIGNED

Issue 40956 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_ranlib_simulation: Direct-leak in bfd_malloc

2022-02-03 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 40956 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_ranlib_simulation: Direct-leak in bfd_malloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40956#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derest

[Bug ld/28858] Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_38-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e12b488e42d365ab8861cfa0fcd6dff50e82e9ec commit e12b488e42d365ab88

[Bug ld/28858] Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8d26ee1cd166b8565df17c82e7ecc9d35b5a367f commit 8d26ee1cd166b8565df17c82e7ecc9d3

Issue 40836 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Integer-overflow in atof_generic

2022-02-03 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Comment #6 on issue 40836 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Integer-overflow in atof_generic https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40836#c6 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your frien

[Bug ld/28858] Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/28858] Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread dani at danielbertalan dot dev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Bertalan --- Support for R_X86_64_PLTOFF64 seems to have only been added in October 2021 to LLD, so these object files can only be linked with LLD built from the not-yet-released LLVM 14 branch. The files in the tar

[Bug ld/28858] Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are rece

[Bug ld/28858] Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-02-03 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/28859] New: Assertion failed while building glibc on raspbian bookworm.

2022-02-03 Thread plugwash at p10link dot net
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28859 Bug ID: 28859 Summary: Assertion failed while building glibc on raspbian bookworm. Product: binutils Version: 2.38 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ld/28858] Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread dani at danielbertalan dot dev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Bertalan --- Apologies, it looks like the attachment was rejected by Bugzilla. You can download it from the following link: https://drive.protonmail.com/urls/GF4WTHSCB0#y9oAm0P4e8vf -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug ld/28855] [2.38 Regression] ld fails to build gnat on x86_64-linux-gnux32

2022-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28855 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- I can build with glibc 2.34. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/28858] New: Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs

2022-02-03 Thread dani at danielbertalan dot dev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28858 Bug ID: 28858 Summary: Some relative relocations are missing when linking with -z pack-relative-relocs Product: binutils Version: 2.38 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug ld/28855] [2.38 Regression] ld fails to build gnat on x86_64-linux-gnux32

2022-02-03 Thread doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28855 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- yes, didn't find out yet why it's missing. Obviously it builds again with glibc 2.35 and the merged libc/libdl. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/28848] [2.38 Regression] ld assertion fail ../../bfd/elf32-arm.c:14807

2022-02-03 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28848 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co