https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #17 from Steve McIntyre ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #16)
> hmmm It looks like I'm dropped to a QEMU shell.
>
> (qemu) info status
> VM status: running
>
> which says running, perhaps I can't do this over SSH and
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina ---
hmmm It looks like I'm dropped to a QEMU shell.
(qemu) info status
VM status: running
which says running, perhaps I can't do this over SSH and a window has popped up
on the desktop? If so I'll check i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #15 from Steve McIntyre ---
Hmmm, OK.
That UEFI image (when padded up to 64MiB) starts here and will let me start an
OS or go into the shell OK. Are you getting any errors?(In reply to Tamar
Christina from comment #14)
> (In reply
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #14 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Steve McIntyre from comment #13)
> Hmmm, OK.
>
> That UEFI image (when padded up to 64MiB) starts here and will let me start
> an OS or go into the shell OK. Are you getting any errors?
N
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #13 from Steve McIntyre ---
Hmmm, OK.
That UEFI image (when padded up to 64MiB) starts here and will let me start an
OS or go into the shell OK. Are you getting any errors?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #12 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Steve McIntyre from comment #11)
> Hi!
>
> Do you have an existing UEFI image (e.g. edk2 AAVMF) to use for testing with?
I have been attempting to use QEMU_EFI.fd from
http://snapshots.l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #11 from Steve McIntyre ---
Hi!
Do you have an existing UEFI image (e.g. edk2 AAVMF) to use for testing with?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206
--- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina ---
Does anyone happen to know of an easy(ish) way I can test this?
I've downloaded and modified https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnu-efi/ to
remove the hacks and fixed up the linker script.
I can now pro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Alan was replying to comment 6 where I said the default constructor could just
be removed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #7)
> gold continues to be built with older compilers such as gcc-4.8 which
> default to c++98. So beware relying on c++11. (I've been tripped up using
> c++11 features in
10 matches
Mail list logo
