[Bug ld/28452] New: ld: unknown phdr type `PT_GNU_RELRO' (try integer literal)

2021-10-14 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28452 Bug ID: 28452 Summary: ld: unknown phdr type `PT_GNU_RELRO' (try integer literal) Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gas/27145] [AArch64] opcodes/aarch64-opc.c: missing system registers

2021-10-14 Thread przemyslaw.wirkus at arm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27145 Przemyslaw Wirkus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||przemyslaw.wirkus at arm dot com

[Bug gold/28417] std::string no longer allows accepting nullptr_t since it is undefined behavior after yesterday's change on libstdc++.

2021-10-14 Thread jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Then default constructing the string member is the right thing to do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/28417] std::string no longer allows accepting nullptr_t since it is undefined behavior after yesterday's change on libstdc++.

2021-10-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- gold continues to be built with older compilers such as gcc-4.8 which default to c++98. So beware relying on c++11. (I've been tripped up using c++11 features in gold patches.) -- You are receiving this m

[Bug gold/28417] std::string no longer allows accepting nullptr_t since it is undefined behavior after yesterday's change on libstdc++.

2021-10-14 Thread jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Search_directory() says: // We need a default constructor because we put this in a // std::vector That is not true since C++11. Since the constructor is broken (has undefined behaviour, which libstdc++

[Bug gold/28417] std::string no longer allows accepting nullptr_t since it is undefined behavior after yesterday's change on libstdc++.

2021-10-14 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28417 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liska --- @Cary: Can you please send the patch to the mailing list? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.