https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27259
--- Comment #10 from Fangrui Song ---
On LLD side, I've sent
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-February/148682.html to seek for
feedback whether we can drop the "__start_/__stop_ retain C identifier name
sections" rule.
On the Li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27442
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27443
Bug ID: 27443
Summary: FAIL: pr25355.o
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27442
Bug ID: 27442
Summary: FAIL: Local ifunc-using executable does not contain
R_*_IRELATIVE relocation
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27441
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
As-needed shared libraries are supposed to behave like archives in the sense
that they should only be seen to be needed if they satisfy a non-weak undefined
symbol reference *at the point they are loaded*. S
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27297
seanga2 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seanga2 at gmail dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25216
seanga2 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seanga2 at gmail dot com
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27360
seanga2 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seanga2 at gmail dot com
--
Updates:
Labels: -restrict-view-commit
Comment #7 on issue 27734 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_readelf: Abrt with empty
stacktrace
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=27734#c7
This bug has been fixed for 30 days. It has been opened to the public.
- Your friendly Sheriff
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #6 from holger.berger at googlemail dot com ---
correct... the proper patch would not contain the 524 thing,
but some sort of patch is needed.
Am Fr., 19. Feb. 2021 um 18:56 Uhr schrieb bugdal at aerifal dot cx <
sourceware-bugzi..
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #5 from Rich Felker ---
Ah no, at least according to your patch the original gold bug seems to be there
still too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #4 from Rich Felker ---
Oh, was this already fixed and the new comment just a matter of lustre
erroneously returning a value that's not a valid error code to userspace?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #3 from holger.berger at googlemail dot com ---
for me this patch works, but I think lustre should not leak it's internal error
code to teh client side, so the lustre part should probably not be part of an
official fix, and I think
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker ---
Why is this still open? It's trivial to fix.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27441
Martin Liska changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26541
holger.berger at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||holger.berger at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27441
Bug ID: 27441
Summary: Small inconsistency in between gold and bfd
Product: binutils
Version: 2.37 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Co
17 matches
Mail list logo