[Bug ld/27093] New: should BFD not produce `-z norelro ignored` when target emulation is unsupported?

2020-12-17 Thread ndesaulniers at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27093 Bug ID: 27093 Summary: should BFD not produce `-z norelro ignored` when target emulation is unsupported? Product: binutils Version: 2.35.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gold/25975] --dynamic-list doesn't work correctly

2020-12-17 Thread mikhail.matrosov at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25975 Mikhail Matrosov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikhail.matrosov at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/27091] executable is incorrectly marked as ELFOSABI_GNU

2020-12-17 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27091 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- That is irrelevant. Without the marking the bit has no defined meaning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27091] executable is incorrectly marked as ELFOSABI_GNU

2020-12-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27091 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1) > SHF_GNU_RETAIN is in the OS-specific range, the marking is required to > properly recognize it. SHF_GNU_RETAIN does nothing on shared object and executable. Linke

[Bug ld/27091] executable is incorrectly marked as ELFOSABI_GNU

2020-12-17 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27091 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- SHF_GNU_RETAIN is in the OS-specific range, the marking is required to properly recognize it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27091] New: executable is incorrectly marked as ELFOSABI_GNU

2020-12-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27091 Bug ID: 27091 Summary: executable is incorrectly marked as ELFOSABI_GNU Product: binutils Version: 2.36 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compo

[Bug ld/27090] New: Missing test for libdep.so

2020-12-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27090 Bug ID: 27090 Summary: Missing test for libdep.so Product: binutils Version: 2.36 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Ass