[Bug binutils/27064] Solaris 11.4 ld build failure

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/27064] Solaris 11.4 ld build failure

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6abe7848fa4140b3cb79c6810758b21562efdc0d commit 6abe7848fa4140b3cb79c6810758b

[Bug ld/26978] Inconsistency for defined foo@v1 and foo@@v1

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26978 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.36 Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/27057] binutils 2.24, 2.35 do not build on Solaris 11.4

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27057 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|WAITING

[Bug binutils/27064] Solaris 11.4 ld build failure

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-12-14 Summary|binutils w

[Bug gold/24123] incremental_copy_test failure when building with gcc-9

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24123 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gold/23539] --incremental-update doesn't work with GNU properties

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23539 Cary Coutant changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/24123] incremental_copy_test failure when building with gcc-9

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24123 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f22318ef0db86d623e11efbd8936430f38484f69 commit f22318ef0db86d623e11efbd893

[Bug gold/23539] --incremental-update doesn't work with GNU properties

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23539 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f22318ef0db86d623e11efbd8936430f38484f69 commit f22318ef0db86d623e11efbd893

[Bug gold/23539] --incremental-update doesn't work with GNU properties

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23539 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=387a56a5435500ba2d2eac3fe76de1f400381cbe commit 387a56a5435500ba2d2eac3fe76

[Bug gold/24123] incremental_copy_test failure when building with gcc-9

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24123 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Cary Coutant : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f12650bff1a591357c26e0ef6d7be0323f76fdb8 commit f12650bff1a591357c26e0ef6d7

[Bug gas/27066] [ARM] Unaligned LDRD instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27066 --- Comment #1 from Wojciech Kordalski --- To make this bug report clear: The problem is that the LDRD instruction is not word-aligned (32-bit aligned). The manual states that if the LDRD instruction is not word-aligned, it is UNPREDICTABLE.

[Bug gas/27066] [ARM] Unaligned LDRD instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27066 Wojciech Kordalski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor -- You are receiving this

[Bug gas/27066] New: [ARM] Unaligned LDRD instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27066 Bug ID: 27066 Summary: [ARM] Unaligned LDRD instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.35.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas

[Bug gas/27065] New: [ARM] If-Then instruction and .align directive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27065 Bug ID: 27065 Summary: [ARM] If-Then instruction and .align directive Product: binutils Version: 2.35.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Comp

[Bug binutils/27064] binutils windres 2.35 "can't detect target endianness and architecture"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 --- Comment #4 from progman3k at gmail dot com --- ~/binutils-2.35$ CC=gcc ./configure --enable-targets=i386-pe Configure runs OK but building fails: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I../bfd -I./../bfd -I./../include -I./../zlib -g -O2 -DLO

[Bug binutils/27064] binutils windres 2.35 "can't detect target endianness and architecture"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- --enable-targets=i386-pe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27064] binutils windres 2.35 "can't detect target endianness and architecture"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 --- Comment #2 from progman3k at gmail dot com --- Thank you Andreas! How do I enable that when configuring/building? Luckily, I was able to recover a binary windres from a solaris 2.4 machine that had binutils version 2.24 on it. Incredibly

[Bug binutils/27064] binutils windres 2.35 "can't detect target endianness and architecture"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- You need to enable support for pe-i386, for example by adding i386-pe as an additional target configuration. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27064] New: binutils windres 2.35 "can't detect target endianness and architecture"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27064 Bug ID: 27064 Summary: binutils windres 2.35 "can't detect target endianness and architecture" Product: binutils Version: 2.35 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: