https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27057
--- Comment #4 from progman3k at gmail dot com ---
Using gmake does indeed build!
The only problem is that it is not mentioned in the README.
Maybe amend the documentation to mention that on some systems, one must use
gmake.
Also maybe add i
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27057
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-12
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27057
--- Comment #2 from progman3k at gmail dot com ---
I have no idea why the system seems to think the attached file "Build stage" is
a binary file, but it is the log output from the terminal of the messages from
building
--
You are receiving th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27057
--- Comment #1 from progman3k at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 13044
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13044&action=edit
Build stage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27057
Bug ID: 27057
Summary: binutils 2.24, 2.35 do not build on Solaris 11.4
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
--- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=14a772212b8e8e19b45a23e2dacb61ceff0d4979
commit 14a772212b8e8e19b45a23e2dac
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
--- Comment #5 from Sergey Belyashov ---
I think, it is OK. I just took code from blackfin source.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
That's the *compiler* flag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
that was reported for qemu:
./configure:# Check we support --no-pie first; we will need this for building
ROMs.
./configure:if compile_prog "-Werror -fno-pie" "-no-pie"; then
./configure: LDFLAGS_NOPIE=
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5)
> Not to be facetious but did we ever really support -no-pie ?
>
ld/testsuite/config/default.exp: set NOPIE_LDFLAGS "-no-pie"
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
--- Comment #3 from Sergey Belyashov ---
Created attachment 13038
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13038&action=edit
Add .bss instruction support
This patch adds support for .bss directive.
--
You are receiving this m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bss section not supported |.bss pseudo operation not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
LONGIND returns the index in LONGOPT of the long-named option found.
It is only valid when a long-named option has been found by the most
recent call.
Since the long option isn't found, LONGIND is unde
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
longind may not be set by getopt_long_only:
diff --git a/ld/lexsup.c b/ld/lexsup.c
index 0d10bc6fba..60e3f7d8b5 100644
--- a/ld/lexsup.c
+++ b/ld/lexsup.c
@@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ parse_args (unsigned argc, char **a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
$ valgrind ./ld/ld-new -no-pie
==290969== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==290969== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==290969== Using Valgrind-3.16.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
--- Comment #1 from Sergey Belyashov ---
.bss section is supported. But .bss pseudo operation is not supported. You can
create .bss section using .section pseudo operation.
Just try:
$ cat a.s
.section .bss
myvar: .ds 2
$ z80-unknown-elf-a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sergey.belyashov at gmail dot
com
--
Y
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27047
Pete Moore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||z80-unknown-elf
--
You are receiving th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050
Bug ID: 27050
Summary: [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Co
24 matches
Mail list logo
