[Bug ld/26979] Visibility of undefined foo@v1 should constrain defined foo@@v1

2020-11-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26979 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/26979] Visibility of undefined foo@v1 should constrain defined foo@@v1

2020-11-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26979 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5160d0f323d47031cb73c39a4dbd31d8976b4c8e commit 5160d0f323d47031cb73c39a4dbd3

[Bug binutils/26907] objcopy gives memsiz to segment containing empty SHT_NOBITS section

2020-11-30 Thread jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907 --- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Created attachment 13012 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13012&action=edit pr26907-2.s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/26907] objcopy gives memsiz to segment containing empty SHT_NOBITS section

2020-11-30 Thread jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907 --- Comment #7 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Created attachment 13011 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13011&action=edit pr26907-2.out -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/26907] objcopy gives memsiz to segment containing empty SHT_NOBITS section

2020-11-30 Thread jozef.l at mittosystems dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26907 --- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz --- Created attachment 13010 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13010&action=edit pr26907-2.ld Thanks. However, I'm getting a similar issue with the attached linker script - an empty

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2020-11-30 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 --- Comment #11 from Rich Felker --- Yes, see my footnote in comment 4. That works just as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2020-11-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com -- You

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2020-11-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Nick Cli

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2020-11-30 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 --- Comment #9 from Rich Felker --- > > 1. make_tempname with fd_return==NULL is *always* a bug, > Well, I would argue that it is only a bug if the temporary file is going to be manipulated by other system functions. Are you going to create

[Bug ld/26936] ld drops relocation for .text.__x86.get_pc_thunk.bx

2020-11-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26936 --- Comment #24 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=15eb8c2d923343363be1c6cfb74134ea019236bb commit 15eb8c2d923343363be1c6cfb74134e

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2020-11-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13006|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2020-11-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13004|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2020-11-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 13005 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13005&action=edit Proposed patch Siddhesh Poyarekar pointed out a bug in the previous patches. I was calling fchmod() and f

[Bug ld/26979] Visibility of undefined foo@v1 should constrain defined foo@@v1

2020-11-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26979 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/26945] Unsafe chown+chmod in smart_rename, possibly elsewhere

2020-11-30 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #13003|0 |1 is obsolete|