[Bug binutils/26705] MODRM isn't properly handled

2020-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26705 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|REX_W prefix isn't properly |MODRM isn't properly |han

[Bug binutils/26705] New: REX_W prefix isn't properly handled

2020-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26705 Bug ID: 26705 Summary: REX_W prefix isn't properly handled Product: binutils Version: 2.36 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutil

[Bug binutils/26704] New: Missing the 'l' suffix for sysret in 64-bit mode

2020-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26704 Bug ID: 26704 Summary: Missing the 'l' suffix for sysret in 64-bit mode Product: binutils Version: 2.36 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compo

[Bug gas/26703] Support x86 micro-architecture ISA level marker

2020-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26703 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug gas/26703] Support x86 micro-architecture ISA level marker

2020-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26703 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://sourceware.org/pipe

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-04 Thread u1049321969 at caramail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 TK Chia changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12888|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-04 Thread u1049321969 at caramail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 --- Comment #9 from TK Chia --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > (In reply to TK Chia from comment #7) > > Created attachment 12888 [details] > > Updated patch (objdump -dw) > > > > Hello H.J., > > > > As requested. Thank you! > > L

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-04 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-04 Thread u1049321969 at caramail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 TK Chia changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12887|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to TK Chia from comment #5) > Created attachment 12887 [details] > Updated patch (adds linker tests) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > > You need to test both i386 and x86-64. Linker tes

[PATCH] Fix typos

2020-10-04 Thread Samanta Navarro
--- binutils/doc/binutils.texi | 14 +++--- cpu/m32r.cpu | 2 +- gas/doc/as.texi| 2 +- gas/doc/c-wasm32.texi | 2 +- opcodes/cgen-asm.c | 4 ++-- opcodes/cgen-dis.c | 4 ++-- opcodes/tic30-dis.c| 2 +- 7 files changed, 15 insert

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-04 Thread u1049321969 at caramail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 TK Chia changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12881|0 |1 is obsolete|