[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library

2020-10-02 Thread vampyrebat at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 Kib changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vampyrebat at gmail dot com -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/12017] Would like to disable compiler warning re use of tmpnam

2020-10-02 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12017 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eyalroz at technion dot ac.il --- Co

[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library

2020-10-02 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library

2020-10-02 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving th

[Bug ld/26701] New: Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library

2020-10-02 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 Bug ID: 26701 Summary: Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gas/26253] Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0

2020-10-02 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 --- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2) > Created attachment 12886 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi Fangrui, > > Please could you try out the attached patch and see if it does what you > expect. >

[Bug gas/26253] Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0

2020-10-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to TK Chia from comment #3) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > > > Please also include a linker testcase to show that the final binary is > > correct. > > May I know where the test case should

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-02 Thread u1049321969 at caramail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 --- Comment #3 from TK Chia --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > Please also include a linker testcase to show that the final binary is > correct. May I know where the test case should go within the source tree? Thank you! -- You a

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

2020-10-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug ld/26681] The section flag 'o' doesn't work on NOTE section

2020-10-02 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26681 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7026832e52cff026f877616ac0033c7bb8d1df6f commit 7026832e52cff026f877616ac00

[Bug ld/26681] The section flag 'o' doesn't work on NOTE section

2020-10-02 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26681 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW