https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26595
Bug ID: 26595
Summary: objdump/readelf debuginfod client not invoked for
altdebug dwz file
Product: binutils
Version: 2.34
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26588
--- Comment #1 from sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com ---
(In reply to sourceware-bugzilla from comment #0)
> I'm not sure whether it would be better to call generate_edata in the no
> exports but enable reloc section case, or my proposed p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26169
Roland McGrath changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.36
URL|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #5 from Kristen Carlson Accardi ---
https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/4dc070f53f4f96b47dba4e4e51bb65d75f2071bb.ca...@linux.intel.com/T/#mb29f61d93a1f0307212053c90ab86cb9fe5a64ee
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #4 from Kristen Carlson Accardi ---
This feature was well received by the livepatch maintainers. It not only solves
my individual problem, but also would allow them to more precisely locate
duplicate symbols in general for patching
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26590
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Your testcase demonstrates --as-needed working as designed. This is not a bug
in ld.bfd and the fact that gold does not diagnose an undefined symbol does not
mean much.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26590
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Both gold and lld generate output. But
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr26530a]$ ./x
1
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr26530a]$ LD_BIND_NOW=1 ./x
./x: symbol lookup error: ./liblto-18c.so: undefined symbol: f1
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr26530a]$
I t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26590
Bug ID: 26590
Summary: --as-needed doesn't work correctly
Product: binutils
Version: 2.36 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26580
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
bfin-elf
./ld-new: the bfin target does not currently support the generation of copy
relocations
and other mips targets too. I saw all of these myself before committing the
test, and decided they were suffi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26589
--- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 12828
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12828&action=edit
gcc -v
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26580
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26578
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26580
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.36
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26578
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dfbee68088e822453fdc82f6b8a3a5bc468944b1
commit dfbee68088e822453fdc82f6b8a3a
15 matches
Mail list logo