[Bug ld/22843] Provide dependency information from the linker similar to the compiler

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22843 Roland McGrath changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/26163] Combination of LTO and -Wl,--defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://sourceware.org/pipe

[Bug ld/26163] New: Combination of LTO and -Wl,--defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug ID: 26163 Summary: Combination of LTO and -Wl,--defsym causes symbol to be resolved as NULL Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/22843] Provide dependency information from the linker similar to the compiler

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22843 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Roland McGrath : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f37b21b481a7804a13c5806098c19b6119288ba4 commit f37b21b481a7804a13c580609

[Bug binutils/26153] .gnu.version reported as orphan section even when not emitted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26153 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d0dded5bc251e506ef65b13696c624ea8669ed6e commit d0dded5bc251e506ef65b13696c624ea

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --start-group

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #12 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9221725d1f6e3f5dd0c0143ee750460619c582f2 commit 9221725d1f6e3f5dd0c0143ee750

[Bug binutils/26112] readelf --debug-dump=macro can't parse clang debug info

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26112 Bug 26112 depends on bug 26160, which changed state. Bug 26160 Summary: [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70 https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=39f381cb80463bd814da549a927bee4643d4ceac commit 39f381cb80463bd814da549a927

[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/26112] readelf --debug-dump=macro can't parse clang debug info

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26112 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=80fda85ca18ee287c826a90b09c5cb8e20fd4d54 commit 80fda85ca18ee287c826a90b09c5cb8e

[Bug binutils/26160] [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug binutils/26112] readelf --debug-dump=macro can't parse clang debug info

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26112 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||26160 Referenced Bugs: https://sourceware

[Bug binutils/26160] New: [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26160 Bug ID: 26160 Summary: [2.35 Regression] Warning: index table size is too small 0 vs 70 Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug binutils/26153] .gnu.version reported as orphan section even when not emitted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26153 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --start-group

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #11 from Pekka Seppänen --- Oh my... I completely forgot the --plugin part and how it participates with ar. This is my bad, sorry :( Indeed the resulting (thin) archive is a bit different whether or not --plugin is there, namely

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --start-group

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Assertion failure at|Assertion failure at |

[Bug ld/26150] Assertion failure at ldlang.c:7269 when using inline assembly, -flto and --no-whole-archive

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26150 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- This took a little time to recreate, mainly due to using $(wildcard ) in the makefile. That was a bad idea, because the order of files in the archive matters for this testcase, and apparently my file order

[Bug gas/26141] -fvisibility=hidden generates JUMP11 relocations on ARM

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26141 --- Comment #6 from Jason A. Donenfeld --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > Hi Jason, > > Thanks for the test case. There was a small problem with it, in that > it deletes all of the temporary files at the end, including the

[Bug binutils/26153] .gnu.version reported as orphan section even when not emitted

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26153 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gas/26141] -fvisibility=hidden generates JUMP11 relocations on ARM

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26141 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 12652 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12652&action=edit Proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/26141] -fvisibility=hidden generates JUMP11 relocations on ARM

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26141 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|