https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25632
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25651
Bug ID: 25651
Summary: objcopy : SIGSEGV in copy_object ( objcopy.c:3392 )
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25648
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25648
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25645
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #43 from H.J. Lu ---
Based on the feedbacks, I updated users/hjl/pr25617/master branch to issue
a linker error when dynamic symbol table from PT_DYNAMIC segment is used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25640
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > > > Created attachment 12355 [de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25614
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 12363
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12363&action=edit
Assembled form of foo.s
Never mind - I have assembled it myself...
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25640
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > > Created attachment 12355 [details]
> > > Pass -flto-partition=none to GCC
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25640
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 12355 [details]
> > Pass -flto-partition=none to GCC
>
> The patch does not work, very likely due to:
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25614
--- Comment #9 from Paul Robinson
---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #8)
> Also - what does a file name for file 0 mean ?
My reading of the DWARF v5 spec is that file 0 specifies the root source
file (= the DW_AT_name from the compil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25614
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Nick,
> Attached what Clang produces for an empty function definition with -gdwarf-5.
Please could you also upload the foo.o file that results from
assembling foo.s ?
Also - what does a file name for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25648
Bug ID: 25648
Summary: strip-new: SIGSEGV in ihex_write_record
Product: binutils
Version: 2.35 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compon
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25645
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25645
Ahcheong Lee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dkcjd2000 at gmail dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25640
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> Created attachment 12355 [details]
> Pass -flto-partition=none to GCC
The patch does not work, very likely due to:
lto-wrapper.c:608:
604 /* Drop argum
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25645
Bug ID: 25645
Summary: [readelf] Crash with -a -D option in
byte_get_little_endian at elfcomm.c:148
Product: binutils
Version: 2.34
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
17 matches
Mail list logo