[Bug ld/25570] [ld] Duplicate "warning: changing start of section"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25570 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ld/25570] [ld] Duplicate "warning: changing start of section"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25570 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/25570] [ld] Duplicate "warning: changing start of section"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25570 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=91114f7583fac8fdf57c58a1f632839da62e43da commit 91114f7583fac8fdf57c58a1f6328

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 Kaylee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #12336|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #8 from Kaylee --- Created attachment 12341 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12341&action=edit patch to add a test for the flag This adds some testing for the flag. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/25561] Incorrect DWARF info emitted when variable removed due to --gc-sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561 --- Comment #4 from chrisc112358 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > Plus at the moment the linker does not > really have any code to reformat the contents of a debug section. Ah, got it, I wasn't sure whether i

[Bug ld/25561] Incorrect DWARF info emitted when variable removed due to --gc-sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Chris, > Thanks for the info and context Nick, appreciate it! At a high level I figured > the linker is already updating "DW_AT_location" today when it determines the > actual address during the placeme

[Bug binutils/25624] objdump: attempting free on address which was not malloc()-ed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25624 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/25447] objcopy : free() invalid pointer in _bfd_coff_free_symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25447 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||natalierice at yeah dot net --- Commen

[Bug gas/25627] z80: [patch] Fix instruction assemble and disassemble bug

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25627 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gas/25627] z80: [patch] Fix instruction assemble and disassemble bug

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25627 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b8ba13856360d1cae00269a0ffe291cf573bb575 commit b8ba13856360d1cae00269a0ffe

[Bug ld/25561] Incorrect DWARF info emitted when variable removed due to --gc-sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561 --- Comment #2 from chrisc112358 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Hi Chris, > > > The "DW_AT_location" of a variable which is discarded as a result of using > > the CFLAG -fdata-sections and the LDFLAG --gc-sec

[Bug binutils/25625] objdump: Aborted (core dumped)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25625 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/25625] objdump: Aborted (core dumped)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25625 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5be2b2f549b0ba0743938d1d74708d79cf42dc0f commit 5be2b2f549b0ba0743938d1d747

Re: Found a bug in objdump-2.34

Hi Natalie, > Hi, I found a bug in objdump-2.34 by my fuzzing research tool (not published > yet), which I ran with ASAN and shows the information below. > Information and also the 11 similar crashes in an archive file are in the > attachment. Thank you very much for letting us know about this

[Bug gas/25622] [2.35 Regression] Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25622 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/25627] z80: [patch] Fix instruction assemble and disassemble bug

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25627 Sergey Belyashov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at sourceware dot org -- Yo

[Bug gas/25627] New: z80: [patch] Fix instruction assemble and disassemble bug

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25627 Bug ID: 25627 Summary: z80: [patch] Fix instruction assemble and disassemble bug Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gas/25622] [2.35 Regression] Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25622 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=10d97a0f99079325bf85e17cc741496e686a6b74 commit 10d97a0f99079325bf85e17cc741496e

Found a bug in objdump-2.34

Hi, I found a bug in objdump-2.34 by my fuzzing research tool (not published yet), which I ran with ASAN and shows the information below. Information and also the 11 similar crashes in an archive file are in the attachment. I hope this will help. natalie@mars:~/Research/Bug$ ./objdump --dwar

[Bug binutils/25624] objdump: attempting free on address which was not malloc()-ed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25624 Natalie changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|attempting free on address |objdump: attempting free on

[Bug binutils/25625] New: objdump: Aborted (core dumped)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25625 Bug ID: 25625 Summary: objdump: Aborted (core dumped) Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils

[Bug binutils/25624] New: attempting free on address which was not malloc()-ed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25624 Bug ID: 25624 Summary: attempting free on address which was not malloc()-ed Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gas/25614] dwarf-5 allows for .file 0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25614 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gas/25611] [DWARF-5] support for checksums in .file directives

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25611 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gas/25612] -gdwarf-{3,4,5} command line arguments

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25612 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug gas/25604] z80: [patch] Fix segfault caused by infinite recursion

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25604 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gas/25604] z80: [patch] Fix segfault caused by infinite recursion

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25604 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8326546ebb46bba75a01e441960f408dd7ccdf2c commit 8326546ebb46bba75a01e441960

[Bug ld/25588] Documentation inaccurate for directories searched when a shared library is requiring another

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25588 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ld/25588] Documentation inaccurate for directories searched when a shared library is requiring another

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25588 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d8e4137b5efc2dd5e99c45534cdccbdfcc814f1a commit d8e4137b5efc2dd5e99c45534cd

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Kaylee from comment #5) > Created attachment 12336 [details] > patch to add flag to not emit section header tables > > I've written a small patch to add such a flag, does this look good to you? Yo

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 --- Comment #5 from Kaylee --- Created attachment 12336 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12336&action=edit patch to add flag to not emit section header tables I've written a small patch to add such a flag, does this loo

[Bug gas/25622] [2.35 Regression] Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25622 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug gas/25622] [2.35 Regression] Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25622 --- Comment #3 from Jan Beulich --- Well, that's not a regression at all, but intended behavior. The requirement you had put up was that gcc be fixed before the changes goes into gas. This did happen. If new gas is to be used with old gcc, the