[Bug gas/25622] [2.35 Regression] Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25622 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- At least, I saw Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd' Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cv

[Bug gas/25622] [2.35 Regression] Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25622 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.35 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Many

[Bug gas/25622] New: [2.35 Regression] Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25622 Bug ID: 25622 Summary: [2.35 Regression] Warning: no instruction mnemonic suffix given and no register operands; using default for `cvtsi2sd' Product: binutils

[Bug gas/25621] x86 jcc short/long is not relaxed to the finest.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25621 Maverick Woo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maverick.woo at gmail dot com -- You

[Bug gas/25621] New: x86 jcc short/long is not relaxed to the finest.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25621 Bug ID: 25621 Summary: x86 jcc short/long is not relaxed to the finest. Product: binutils Version: 2.34 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Comp

[Bug gas/25621] x86 jcc short/long is not relaxed to the finest.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25621 kaiyuan1 at andrew dot cmu.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kaiyuan1 at andrew dot

[Bug binutils/25572] /dev/null should be excluded from 'files are the same' check

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25572 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/25572] /dev/null should be excluded from 'files are the same' check

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25572 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gas/12269] unknown-z80-coff: Incorrect assembly of indexed register offsets from equ declarations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12269 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/25561] Incorrect DWARF info emitted when variable removed due to --gc-sections

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25561 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gold/25617] Gold looks up shared object information in section headers instead of the dynamic array

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Linker

[Bug binutils/25543] Wrong 'readelf -p' output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25543 --- Comment #4 from Holger Hopp --- I think this solution is okay. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/25543] Wrong 'readelf -p' output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25543 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/25543] Wrong 'readelf -p' output

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25543 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ba3265d04cc794d2af8b7d590a0658f7d732071c commit ba3265d04cc794d2af8b7d590a0