https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25576
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fcaaac0a0d3d46e3c59f87c1445852ac77b6c118
commit fcaaac0a0d3d46e3c59f87c1445
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fcaaac0a0d3d46e3c59f87c1445852ac77b6c118
commit fcaaac0a0d3d46e3c59f87c1445
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #62 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_34-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e2b46ba142d9901897d8189422f0bcc28e5660b8
commit e2b46ba142d990189
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21565
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #60 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #59)
> Fixed on master branch.
Good. Please pull the revision to the 2.34 branch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #16)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #13)
> > > Well, that's what is described by my 2nd option, but it is (as explained)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550
--- Comment #16 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #13)
> > Well, that's what is described by my 2nd option, but it is (as explained)
> > specifically not sufficient to merely ex
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #59 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 12302
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12302&action=edit
A patch to document 5 separate non-integer register ISA extension families
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #58 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=dcf06b89b9129da6988878a77afdd02d3acc2e30
commit dcf06b89b9129da6988878a77afdd02
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #13)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> > I want assembler to enforce assembly codes without any access to MMX state.
>
> Well, that's what is described by my 2nd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537
Sergey Belyashov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Move machine |z80: [patch] Move machine
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25517
Sergey Belyashov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[Z80][PATCH] Use|Z80: [patch] Use
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25576
Sergey Belyashov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25576
Bug ID: 25576
Summary: z80: [patch] Remove unnecessary local label definition
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25550
--- Comment #13 from Jan Beulich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> I want assembler to enforce assembly codes without any access to MMX state.
Well, that's what is described by my 2nd option, but it is (as explained)
specifically n
20 matches
Mail list logo