[Bug binutils/25447] New: objcopy : free() invalid pointer in _bfd_coff_free_symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25447 Bug ID: 25447 Summary: objcopy : free() invalid pointer in _bfd_coff_free_symbols Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug binutils/25444] objcopy : Floating point exception in _bfd_elf_compute_section_file_positions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25444 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gas/25438] x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Also [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr25438]$ cat y.s movzwl %ax, %rcx [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr25438]$ gcc -c y.s [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 pr25438]$ objdump -dw y.o y.o: file format elf64-x86-64 Disassembly of section .text: 0

[Bug binutils/25445] movsxd without REX_W prefix incorrectly disassembled

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|movsx without REX_W prefix |movsxd without REX_W prefix

[Bug binutils/25444] objcopy : Floating point exception in _bfd_elf_compute_section_file_positions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25444 --- Comment #1 from chien_hsiang --- Sorry, don't need so many command line arguments to reproduce the bug. Steps to Reproduce : download the sample from attachment objcopy ./sample -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug binutils/25445] movsx without REX_W prefix incorrectly disassembled

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at suse dot com --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug binutils/25445] movsx without REX_W prefix incorrectly disassembled

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|movsx with 0x66 prefix |movsx without REX_W prefix

[Bug binutils/25445] New: movsx with 0x66 prefix incorrectly disassembled

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445 Bug ID: 25445 Summary: movsx with 0x66 prefix incorrectly disassembled Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

[Bug gas/25438] x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=be4c5e58bdc839898739e0332aee84abf6e5299a commit be4c5e58bdc839898739e0332aee84ab

[Bug binutils/25444] New: objcopy : Floating point exception in _bfd_elf_compute_section_file_positions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25444 Bug ID: 25444 Summary: objcopy : Floating point exception in _bfd_elf_compute_section_file_positions Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gas/25438] x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #2) > For 32-bit (and 16-bit) code though this isn't the way to go, as long as e.g. > > movl%al, %al > movl%ax, %ax > > produce an error on the first

[Bug gas/25438] x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438 --- Comment #2 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > movz* with incorrect operands should be rejected, not silently changed > to something else: > > [hjl@gnu-snb-1 tmp]$ cat x.s > movzbw%al, %ecx > movzbw

[Bug ld/25416] TLSDESC relaxation doesn't work for x32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25416 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6a462ad49ec13bec4659f2a8fb2301cac9742da9 commit 6a462ad49ec13bec4659f2a8fb2301ca

[Bug binutils/16083] objdump provides wrong disassemble for MULSD instruction when used with an unusual combination of prefixes

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 --- Comment #4 from Jan Beulich --- Isn't this effectively (despite being older) a duplicate of 16893, and hence has been fixed along long ago, with that other report? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bu

[Bug gas/25438] x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug gas/25438] New: x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438 Bug ID: 25438 Summary: x86 MOVZ* anomalies for unusual/wrong operand combinations Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gold/25437] Invalid combination --as-needed and -pthread options

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |MOVED -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug gold/25437] Invalid combination --as-needed and -pthread options

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437 laurent.stacul at amadeus dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|MOVED |FIXED --- Comment

[Bug gold/25437] Invalid combination --as-needed and -pthread options

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/25437] New: Invalid combination --as-needed and -pthread options

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25437 Bug ID: 25437 Summary: Invalid combination --as-needed and -pthread options Product: binutils Version: 2.33 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2