[Bug gprof/2587] Failed to build gprof under gmake patched by Apple.

2019-11-13 Thread parakleta at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587 --- Comment #8 from parakleta at gmail dot com --- (In reply to parakleta from comment #7) > I've just realised that changing the order of rules may not work. Ignore this. There is an explicit dependency on the "BUILT_SOURCES" existing which

[Bug gprof/2587] Failed to build gprof under gmake patched by Apple.

2019-11-13 Thread parakleta at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587 --- Comment #7 from parakleta at gmail dot com --- I've just realised that changing the order of rules may not work. We want to have '.m -> .c -> .o' as the sequence without triggering '.m -> .o', and by setting '.c' before '.m' we're saying if

[Bug gprof/2587] Failed to build gprof under gmake patched by Apple.

2019-11-13 Thread parakleta at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587 --- Comment #6 from parakleta at gmail dot com --- Sorry, by suffix rule order this means the order of suffixes in the `.SUFFIXES:` target which is autogenerated by the `SUFFIXES` variable in the "makefile.am" file. Your change will attempt to

[Bug gprof/2587] Failed to build gprof under gmake patched by Apple.

2019-11-13 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug gprof/2587] Failed to build gprof under gmake patched by Apple.

2019-11-13 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=415ed2a17588f855397cc2d03aa68a79e84f77f7 commit 415ed2a17588f855397cc2d03aa6

[Bug ld/25029] Invalid PE file caused by discarded .rdata section

2019-11-13 Thread florin.saft...@soft-to-you.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25029 --- Comment #11 from Florin Saftoiu --- Hi Nick, Sorry it took so long, I finally got some time, so I compiled the msys2 binutils-2.32 package from source and ran it in GDB. Here's my GDB session : $ gdb --args /c/work/projects/soft-to-you/o