[Bug gprof/2587] Failed to build gprof under gmake patched by Apple.

2019-11-12 Thread parakleta at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587 parakleta at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||parakleta at gmail dot com

[Bug binutils/25181] RISC-V: Linker relaxation may fail if there are R_RISCV_ALIGN type relocations

2019-11-12 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/25181] RISC-V: Linker relaxation may fail if there are R_RISCV_ALIGN type relocations

2019-11-12 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181 --- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Jim Wilson : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c6261a00c3e70dd8e508062ea43a1bcb6d547621 commit c6261a00c3e70dd8e508062ea43a1

[Bug binutils/25086] BFD does not support target aarch64-w64-mingw32

2019-11-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25086 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle()

2019-11-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Tim Rühsen from comment #8) Hi Tim, > I did, no (new) errors. What is the trick to run the test suite with > valgrind (except from manually running each test) ? Well assuming that you have a

[Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle()

2019-11-12 Thread tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180 --- Comment #8 from Tim Rühsen --- Hi Nick, (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) > > the attached patch fixes the demangler slowness (see commit message for a > > description). > > Did you run the libiberty testsuite to see if it intro

[Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle()

2019-11-12 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Tim, (In reply to Tim Rühsen from comment #6) > the attached patch fixes the demangler slowness (see commit message for a > description). Did you run the libiberty testsuite to see if it introduces any

[Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle()

2019-11-12 Thread tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180 --- Comment #6 from Tim Rühsen --- Hi Nick, the attached patch fixes the demangler slowness (see commit message for a description). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/25180] Slowness in cplus_demangle()

2019-11-12 Thread tim.ruehsen at gmx dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25180 --- Comment #5 from Tim Rühsen --- Created attachment 12072 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12072&action=edit Fix for 25180 (demangler slowness) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the b

[Bug binutils/25181] RISC-V: Linker relaxation may fail if there are R_RISCV_ALIGN type relocations

2019-11-12 Thread yitingwang16 at outlook dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25181 --- Comment #7 from Yiting Wang --- Hi Jim, I am very grateful to you for fixing the defect very quickly and giving me the instructions on how to contributing a patch to Binutils! My colleague has verified your patch works fine. :) I am a Wi