[Bug gas/29] Coreutils POSIX2_VERSION as 200112L

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/29] Coreutils POSIX2_VERSION as 200112L

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29 --- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a315e14713de0a712382b3159507c16a0975a8d1 commit a315e14713de0a712382b3159507c16

[Bug gas/29] Coreutils POSIX2_VERSION as 200112L

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED Assignee|bje at sources

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- OK, I'm leaving it up to you to apply whichever of these patches you prefer.. Yours has this to recommend it in being similar to other target hacks in gc.exp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You ar

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin --- The "possible fix" works for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 12043 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12043&action=edit Patch This is a horrible hack to avoid $$dyncall being called when using gcc-9 and gcc-10, but I wasn

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 12042 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12042&action=edit possible fix This patch should allow the test to pass. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug ld/23567] much larger static binaries compared to a few months ago

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23567 --- Comment #10 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Keith Seitz : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=950b74950f6020eda38647f22e9077ac7f68ca49 commit 950b74950f6020eda38647f22e9

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-10-16 7:33 a.m., John David Anglin wrote: > Final executables always need to be linked against the millicode library on > hppa to provide $$dyncall > and various arithmetic operations

[Bug binutils/25080] strip removes relro program header

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25080 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/13616] linker should pad executable sections with nops, not zeros

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13616 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=22216541c1796e9e1331d6f4e16b03a6f02e7381 commit 22216541c1796e9e1331d6f4e16b0

[Bug ld/25110] FAIL: --gc-sections with __start_SECTIONNAME

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25110 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-10-15 10:23 p.m., amodra at gmail dot com wrote: > Works for me with hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.1.1 20180502 It's probably because I recently changed the optimization of indirect calls in

[Bug binutils/25080] [2.33 Regression] strip removes relro program header

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25080 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose --- now at https://people.debian.org/~guillem/strip-relro/liblog4cplus-2.0.so.3.4.4.xz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___