[Bug gas/23040] .uleb128 directive doesn't accept some valid expressions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23040 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=38cf168be5816b098cc05abffc482fc905db86a2 commit 38cf168be5816b098cc05abffc482

[Bug ld/23806] NULL Pointer Dereference problem was discovered in function merge_strings() in merge.c in bfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23806 wcventure changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Invalid Address Read|NULL Pointer Dereference

[Bug ld/23805] NULL Pointer Dereference exists in the function elf_link_input_bfd() in merge.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23805 wcventure changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|An Invalid Memory Address |NULL Pointer Dereference

[Bug ld/23806] New: Invalid Address Read problem was discovered in function merge_strings() in merge.c in bfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23806 Bug ID: 23806 Summary: Invalid Address Read problem was discovered in function merge_strings() in merge.c in bfd Product: binutils Version: 2.31 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ld/23805] New: An Invalid Memory Address Dereference exists in the function elf_link_input_bfd() in merge.c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23805 Bug ID: 23805 Summary: An Invalid Memory Address Dereference exists in the function elf_link_input_bfd() in merge.c Product: binutils Version: 2.31 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/23804] New: Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function Sec_merge_hash_lookup in merge.c, as demonstrated by "ld -E"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23804 Bug ID: 23804 Summary: Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function Sec_merge_hash_lookup in merge.c, as demonstrated by "ld -E" Product: binutils Version: 2.31

[Bug binutils/23804] Heap-buffer-overflow problem in function Sec_merge_hash_lookup in merge.c, as demonstrated by "ld -E"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23804 --- Comment #1 from wcventure --- Created attachment 11356 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11356&action=edit POC2 Please use the "./ld -E $POC" to reproduce the bug. This bug was discovered by NTU Cyber-Security-Lab. I

[Bug ld/23803] __init_array_end - __init_array_start < 0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23803 --- Comment #8 from schorsch_76 at gmx dot de --- Toolchain Info: georg@M4700-vm:~/Downloads/gcc-arm-none-eabi-7-2018-q2-update/bin$ ./arm-none-eabi-gcc --version arm-none-eabi-gcc (GNU Tools for Arm Embedded Processors 7-2018-q2-update) 7.3.1

[Bug ld/23803] __init_array_end - __init_array_start < 0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23803 schorsch_76 at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Host|

[Bug ld/23803] __init_array_end - __init_array_start < 0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23803 --- Comment #7 from schorsch_76 at gmx dot de --- Created attachment 11354 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11354&action=edit New Makefile with s/(MCU)/(CPU)/g -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC l

[Bug ld/23803] __init_array_end - __init_array_start < 0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23803 --- Comment #5 from schorsch_76 at gmx dot de --- The project doesnt run, it is just as much scaled down to show this behaviour. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug ld/23803] __init_array_end - __init_array_start < 0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23803 --- Comment #6 from schorsch_76 at gmx dot de --- Ops: I hade a small error in the specified makefile: Here is the update. I had MCU instead of CPU variable used. But the __init_array_start is still greater than __init_array_end. -- You are r