https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23109
Bug ID: 23109
Summary: aarch64: opcode wrongly disassembled as sdot
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Componen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ccoutant at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23107
Bug ID: 23107
Summary: 'ar t' doesn't display object file offsets
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20642
Marco Leise changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Marco.Leise at gmx dot de
--- Comment #
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23056
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23056
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bf82069dce1b1a88560e5d7320342c78372b627e
commit bf82069dce1b1a88560e5d73203
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23056
--- Comment #4 from Sergej Schumilo ---
Hi Nick,
it seems like that your patch has fixed the heap overflow bug (or at least the
POC file does not reproduce the ASAN report anymore).
I can also confirm that the patch for PR 23055 fixed the g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16504
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Bernhard, thanks for fixing the test case. Looks like I pasted only part of the
file.
I don't have binutils-2.30 here yet, but I get the same result with
binutils-2.29.1-20.fc28.x86_64.
--
