[Bug gas/23013] Assembler not recognizing 3-opt dcbt instruction form on Power systems

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23013 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug gas/23013] Assembler not recognizing 3-opt dcbt instruction form on Power systems

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23013 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gas/23013] Assembler not recognizing 3-opt dcbt instruction form on Power systems

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23013 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com,

[Bug binutils/23008] Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23008 --- Comment #10 from Dongliang Mu --- Hi, Nick: Thank you for pointing out that issue. I have tested that issue on Debian Stable(GCC + AddressSanitizer, and Clang + AddressSanitizer) and attached three Dockerfiles to prove it is reproducible.

[Bug binutils/23008] Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23008 --- Comment #9 from Dongliang Mu --- Created attachment 10925 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10925&action=edit Dockerfile for Debian Stable (GCC with AddressSanitizer) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug binutils/23008] Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23008 Dongliang Mu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10921|Dockerfile for Ubuntu |Dockerfile for Ubuntu descripti

[Bug binutils/23008] Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23008 Dongliang Mu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10921|Dockerfile for Ubuntu 14.04 |Dockerfile for Ubuntu descripti

[Bug binutils/23008] Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23008 Dongliang Mu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10922|Dockerfile for Debian |Dockerfile for Debian descripti

[Bug gold/23016] New: assert in output.h on mix of .eh_frame types for x86_64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23016 Bug ID: 23016 Summary: assert in output.h on mix of .eh_frame types for x86_64 Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug binutils/22875] Strip complains about and then destroys unrecognised relocs

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22875 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Maciej W. Rozycki : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=75def2abc3dafb52418405905cd49e9c107c2640 commit 75def2abc3dafb52418405

[Bug gas/22318] ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dlsym@@GLIBC_2.16'

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22318 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Give that there is no response from GCC maintainer for more than 5 months, should we check in my patch? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/23008] Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23008 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) > Hi Dongliang, > > > When I try to reproduce this problem with Address Sanitizer in GCC, there > > are some wired errors when I compiled binutils: > > > /usr/bin/ld:

[Bug gas/22773] [ARM] Invalid immediate constants produce incorrect instructions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22773 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_30-branch branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=763e359efaba5cc088604e3f3e1dda40fda06831 commit 763e359efaba5

[Bug gold/22883] Gold mis-evaluates R_X86_64_PLT32 reloc

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22883 --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Hi H.J. > > Yes, the object file is bad. It uses RELA, but stores relocations > > like REL. Which assembler generates it? I have just received this reply from the original reporter: "it is part of ol

[Bug binutils/23008] Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related functions

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23008 --- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Dongliang, > When I try to reproduce this problem with Address Sanitizer in GCC, there > are some wired errors when I compiled binutils: > /usr/bin/ld: ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a(plugin.o): undefined refere