https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22799
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22806
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22805
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22804
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22803
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22805
Bug ID: 22805
Summary: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898
usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎☏ ☐ ☑ ☒*Amazon Alexa customer service
number{{BhabhiJi}}
Product: binu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22806
Bug ID: 22806
Summary: Amazon Alexa Customer Service number 1-800-201-2898
usa ☊ ☋ ☌ ☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑☒*Amazon Alexa customer service
number{{BhabhiJi}}
Product: binu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22804
Bug ID: 22804
Summary: Contact Us @+1(8OO) 2O1-2898 Amazon Alexa Customer
Service Number,Alexa Support 0
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22803
Bug ID: 22803
Summary: setapai 1~800~201~2898amazon Alexa customer
support number @@@ amazon Alexa support phone number!
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
S
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22802
Bug ID: 22802
Summary: massive performance regression for `readelf -n`
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22799
Bug ID: 22799
Summary: Contact 1(844) 601-4333 Amazon Echo Customer Service
Phone Number^&*
Product: binutils
Version: 2.31 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #13)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> > Since there is no need to prepare for PLT branch on x86-64, we can treat
> > PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32 relocat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
--- Comment #13 from Cary Coutant ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> Since there is no need to prepare for PLT branch on x86-64, we can treat
> PC32 relocation with branch as PLT32 relocation. I posted a patch for ld:
>
> https://s
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22710
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22712
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263
--- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c20c30f615756ddfccc4bb75c65ccfc1a399466e
commit c20c30f615756ddfccc4bb75c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22788
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22789
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=46d09186d340407fdcf066fea25444682e989512
commit 46d09186d340407fdcf066fea25
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=68807c3cd64ccc4f0e9261df3e840d30d9a19b51
commit 68807c3cd64ccc4f0e9261df3e8
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22771
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=64e234d417d5685a4aec0edc618114d9991c031b
commit 64e234d417d5685a4aec0edc618
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22791
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
On version 2.30.51.20180206 and master branch of binutils:
there is a reachable assertion in the find_section function of
(src/binutils/readelf.c), which could be triggered by the following POC.
The assertion statement is:
653 static Elf_Internal_Shdr *
654 find_section (Filedata * filedat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22794
Bug ID: 22794
Summary: Unchecked strnlen operation in
bfd_get_debug_link_info_1 (./src/bfd/opncls.c)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22793
Bug ID: 22793
Summary: Reachable assertion in find_section
(src/binutils/readelf.c)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.30
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
29 matches
Mail list logo