https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598
--- Comment #6 from Jim Wilson ---
The address printed for jal is nonsense because it has a reloc, but the address
for the branches should be correct.
I think the problem with the is that we have two ".L0 " fake symbols,
and objdump is using
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598
--- Comment #5 from Palmer Dabbelt ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #4)
> I would expect this to work
> .option norelax
> beq s1, s0, .+102
> bne a4, a5, .-4096
> jal a2, 1048574
> I get
> <.L0 >:
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598
--- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson ---
I would expect this to work
.option norelax
beq s1, s0, .+102
bne a4, a5, .-4096
jal a2, 1048574
I get
<.L0 >:
0: 06848363beq s1,s0,66 <.L0 +0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598
Palmer Dabbelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598
--- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson ---
Note that the testcase is trying to use absolute addresses with a pc-relative
branch. The assembler can't know the address the linker will assign to the
code, so this requires a relocation. I don't know if
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |wilson at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
Yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598
Palmer Dabbelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at dabbelt dot com
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22655
--- Comment #6 from Zach ---
Ah, thanks. Got it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #13 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Hi Nick,
all attached.
best regards
Waldemar
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #12 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10722
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10722&action=edit
test.o object file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #11 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10721
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10721&action=edit
libuClibc.so shared library
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #10 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10720
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10720&action=edit
ld-uClibc.so shared library loader
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #9 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10719
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10719&action=edit
libgcc_eh.a static archive
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #8 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10718
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10718&action=edit
libgcc.a static archive
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #7 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10717
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10717&action=edit
crtendS.o object file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #6 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10716
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10716&action=edit
crtend.o object file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #5 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10715
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10715&action=edit
crtbeginS.o object file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #4 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10714
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10714&action=edit
crtbegin.o object file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
--- Comment #3 from wbx at openadk dot org ---
Created attachment 10713
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10713&action=edit
gcc verbose linker output
gcc -Wl,-verbose output
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22598
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22681
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22681
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=704a705d7aaab8041df76e2981e2a1efc014aad0
commit 704a705d7aaab8041df76e2981e2a1ef
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22589
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22677
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13391
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi John,
I have checked in the patch to document the .largecomm directive.
I do not think that .ldata, .lbss or .lrodata exists as assembler
directives, so I do not plan on documenting these unless
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=102e9361c2756ad7ffceb0713a794c991e69
commit 102e9361c2756ad7ffceb07
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to john from comment #3)
Hi John,
> - I'll try and find the code that generated .lrodata
Probably something like this should work:
const char *bigarray2[THECOUNT];
> This generates .lbss a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22553
--- Comment #3 from john at buu dot ac.th ---
This generates .lbss and .ldata - I'll try and find the code that generated
.lrodata
and send that in a different email.
/*
$gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_W
29 matches
Mail list logo
