https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269
--- Comment #11 from Alan Modra ---
> If there is a program bug:
> ...
> may lead to undesired behavior.
Quite so.
> -z dynamic-undefined-weak applies if there is a DT_NEEDED entry which
> may provide definition for undefined weak reference
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #9)
> > Since call is PC relative, this doesn't branch to address 0.
>
> I don't see why this matters. A symbol that resolves to zero without
> dynamic relocs in a PIE or
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22269
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
> Since call is PC relative, this doesn't branch to address 0.
I don't see why this matters. A symbol that resolves to zero without dynamic
relocs in a PIE or shared lib results in an address of zero. If t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
--- Comment #11 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #10)
> dwarf-mode.el:186:6:Warning: set-keymap-parent called with 1 argument, but
> requires 2
>
> I am not an emacs expert, but maybe this could be a problem ?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21402
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Renlin Li :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6c699715f68be7d8c468e965fbefce997f7ed937
commit 6c699715f68be7d8c468e965fbefc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Tom,
> Thread starts here:
>
> https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-10/msg00082.html
All the changes look fine to me, apart from one. Patch 2/5
has:
+(defvar dwarf-mode-map
+ (let ((map (make-s
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
--- Comment #9 from Tom Tromey ---
Thread starts here:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-10/msg00082.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Tom,
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
> I will look, but I'd appreciate it if you could look at the dwarf-mode.el
> patches that I also posted to the list. Alan had already appr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6)
> Hi Tom,
>
> OK, well your patch is fine, so I have checked that in. I still think
> that we need to improve the documentation however. Do you have any
> sugge
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Tom,
OK, well your patch is fine, so I have checked that in. I still think that
we need to improve the documentation however. Do you have any suggestions ?
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249
--- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ae7e78255666733d238e676a0bab14986a1483dd
commit ae7e78255666733d238e676a0ba
Hi,
I had done porting using binutils 2.26.
Now I want to move to binutils 2.27.
Can someone help me, how can I check what all changes are done from 2.26 to
2.27.
I do not know how to use git.
I want to know what all changes are done for x86-64.
Thanks,
Parul
__
12 matches
Mail list logo