[Bug admin/21394] after deleter

2017-04-18 Thread rakesh.cyrus at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21394 Rakesh Kumar Ranjan changed: What|Removed |Added URL||www.hrms.in CC|

[Bug admin/21394] New: after deleter

2017-04-18 Thread rakesh.cyrus at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21394 Bug ID: 21394 Summary: after deleter Product: binutils Version: 2.27 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: admin Assignee: un

[Bug ld/21382] --as-needed cannot be combined with -flto

2017-04-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21382 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-04/msg00144.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-bi

[Bug binutils/20702] [libopcodes][x86] Invalid suffix for sysret instruction due to data16 prefix

2017-04-18 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20702 --- Comment #1 from nholcomb at wisc dot edu --- This issue appears for return instructions as well. The data16 prefix should not affect instructions acting on address-size dependent operands. Return example: Bytes: 66 c3 Instruction: retw The

[Bug binutils/20706] [libopcodes][x86] invalid quadword XOP instructions using %ymm registers

2017-04-18 Thread nholcomb at wisc dot edu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20706 --- Comment #4 from nholcomb at wisc dot edu --- These input bytes were generated as a way to validate instruction decoders. They are not a part of a real executable, so they weren't created by an assembler. -- You are receiving this mail bec