[Bug ld/20125] mmix: C++ code fails to link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20125 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug gas/20127] Addend not preserved for many X86 relocations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20127 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com -- You are rece

[Bug ld/20117] GOT relocation changes another instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20117 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.27 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed

[Bug ld/20117] GOT relocation changes another instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20117 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The binutils-2_26-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c10d012d18caf2a39d7348a43eae7d8d5a940cdc commit c10d012d18caf2a39d

[Bug gas/20127] New: Addend not preserved for many X86 relocations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20127 Bug ID: 20127 Summary: Addend not preserved for many X86 relocations Product: binutils Version: 2.25 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compone

[Bug gas/19600] Parsing $E@GOT+1 forgets the offset

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19600 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/20117] GOT relocation changes another instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20117 louis.granboulan.developer at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gas/19600] Parsing $E@GOT+1 forgets the offset

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19600 louis.granboulan.developer at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug ld/20125] New: mmix: C++ code fails to link

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20125 Bug ID: 20125 Summary: mmix: C++ code fails to link Product: binutils Version: 2.26 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee

[Bug gas/19600] Parsing $E@GOT+1 forgets the offset

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19600 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/19600] Parsing $E@GOT+1 forgets the offset

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19600 --- Comment #5 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4e21640f674499048157fa62f08b16f6039f78f6 commit 4e21640f674499048157fa62f08b16f6

[Bug ld/20117] GOT relocation changes another instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20117 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to louis.granboulan.developer from comment #3) > Thank you, I looked at the patch and it avoids the bug. > However, in the code with your corrections, there is still this comment: > /

[Bug ld/20117] GOT relocation changes another instruction

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20117 --- Comment #3 from louis.granboulan.developer at gmail dot com --- Thank you, I looked at the patch and it avoids the bug. However, in the code with your corrections, there is still this comment: /* Convert "mov foo@GOT(%reg1

[Bug gas/19600] Parsing $E@GOT+1 forgets the offset

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19600 --- Comment #4 from louis.granboulan.developer at gmail dot com --- Thank you for having solved the other bug I reported. Do you plan to solve this one, or is it something that will never work? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are